Best Answer

Q: Why is 169 not a prime number?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Basic Math

169 is divisible by 13 in addition to 1 and itself. It is not prime.

A prime number is a number that is divisible only by 1 and itself; it has no other factors. The factors of 169 are 1, 13, and 169. Therefore, 169 is not a prime number. It is a composite number.

169 is not a prime number. it can be divided by 13. 169 / 13 = 13. so actually 13 would be the square root of 169.No, it is 13 x 13

The 3 factors of 169 are 1, 13 and 169. The factor pairs of 169 are 1 x 169 and 13 x 13.The prime factors of 169 are 13 and 13.The prime factorization of 169 is 13 x 13 or, in exponential form, 132.Factor Tree:One way to determine the prime factors is to construct a factor tree, continuing to factor each level until all the numbers have been factored into prime numbers. 169 = 13 x 13Since 13 is a prime number, the factor tree is completeThey are: 13*13 = 1691, 13 and 169

The 3 factors of 169 are 1, 13, and 169. The factor pairs of 169 are 1 x 169 and 13 x 13.The prime factors of 169 are 13 and 13.The prime factorization of 169 is 13 x 13 or, in exponential form, 132.Factor Tree:One way to determine the prime factors is to construct a factor tree, continuing to factor each level until all the numbers have been factored into prime numbers. 16913 x 13Since 13 is a prime number, the factor tree is complete.13 x 13

Related questions

169 is divisible by 13 in addition to 1 and itself. It is not prime.

A prime number is a number that is divisible only by 1 and itself; it has no other factors. The factors of 169 are 1, 13, and 169. Therefore, 169 is not a prime number. It is a composite number.

169 is not a prime number. it can be divided by 13. 169 / 13 = 13. so actually 13 would be the square root of 169.No, it is 13 x 13

The only prime number (factor) of 169 is 13 (13 x 13 = 169).

Yes. 169/13=13 13 is a prime number.

The square root of 169 is 13 which is a rational and also a Prime number

I am guessing you want a divisor that is prime. Then the most obvious one is 13 as 132 is 169

338 isn't prime, 338=2*169

No because 169 has more than two factors which makes it a composite number in math

Because it has more than two factors and it is a square number because 13*13 = 169

The prime factors of 169 are 13x13.

A prime number has only 2 factors which are 1 and itself. Composite numbers are everything else except 1 and 0. 1 and 0 are neither prime, nor composite. 169 is composite.