I am guessing you want a divisor that is prime. Then the most obvious one is 13 as 132 is 169
The only prime number (factor) of 169 is 13 (13 x 13 = 169).
The square root of 169 is 13 which is a rational and also a Prime number
No because 169 has more than two factors which makes it a composite number in math
Because it has more than two factors and it is a square number because 13*13 = 169
The 39th prime number is 169. Prime numbers are numbers greater than 1 that have no positive divisors other than 1 and themselves. The sequence of prime numbers begins with 2, 3, 5, 7, and so on, continuing to 169 as the 39th entry in the sequence.
169 is divisible by 13 in addition to 1 and itself. It is not prime.
A prime number is a number that is divisible only by 1 and itself; it has no other factors. The factors of 169 are 1, 13, and 169. Therefore, 169 is not a prime number. It is a composite number.
169 is not a prime number. it can be divided by 13. 169 / 13 = 13. so actually 13 would be the square root of 169.No, it is 13 x 13
Well, hello there! Let's talk about why 169 is not a prime number. You see, a prime number is a number that is only divisible by 1 and itself. Now, when we look at 169, we can see that it can be divided by 13 and 1, as well as 169 and 1. So, 169 is not a prime number, but it's still a special number in its own way.
The only prime number (factor) of 169 is 13 (13 x 13 = 169).
Yes. 169/13=13 13 is a prime number.
The square root of 169 is 13 which is a rational and also a Prime number
338 isn't prime, 338=2*169
No because 169 has more than two factors which makes it a composite number in math
Because it has more than two factors and it is a square number because 13*13 = 169
The prime factors of 169 are 13x13.
2873 is a composite number, not a prime. Its factors are 1, 13, 17, 169, 221, and 2873, and its prime factorization is 13x13x17.