answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The first constraint implies x*y=363, while you are finding the minimum of x+3y. You can do this with multivariable calculus approaches, but I will assume the simplest method is desired and use single-variable calculus methods.

Since xy=363, y=363/x

Substitute this into x+3y, and you get:

f(x)=x+3(363/x)=x+1089/x

Since you have this function as a function of a single variable now, you can minimize it like any other single variable function.

f'(x)=1-1089x-2

by setting f'(x)=0, the solutions x=33 and x=-33 are found. x=-33 is an extraneous solution, since you are required to have positive numbers. So, you must investigate x=33 and confirm it is a minimum.

If x=33 is a minimum of f(x), then values less than x=33 will yield a negative value in f'(x), since the function f(x) must slope downward up until it reaches a minimum. Conversely, values greater than x=33 will yield positive values in f'(x).

1<33

f'(1)=-1088

-1088<0, so f'(1) is negative

40>33

f'(40)=511/1600

511/1600>0, so f'(40) is positive.

In a final summating statement:

Since the function f(x)=1-1089/x2 has a critical point at x=33 and since values less than x=33 result in negative values of f'(x) and values greater than x=33 result in positive values of f'(x), x=33 is a local minimum of f(x).

To get your final final answer:

x=33

y=363/x implies y=363/33=11

x=33,y=11

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: The product of two positive numbers is 363 Minimize the sum of the first and three times the second?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Calculus

What is the difference between non negative integer and positive integer?

The set of non-negative integers includes zero: [0,1,2,3,4,...]. These are also called whole numbers. The set of positive integers does not include zero: [1,2,3,4...]. These are also called counting/natural numbers.


How can you know that a value is the minimum of a function?

When the first derivative of the function is equal to zero and the second derivative is positive.


How long it would take to count to a million at one number per second?

It would take a million seconds = 16666.667 minutes = 277.778 hours = 11.57 days approx. This assumes (a) that you can count 1 per second which may not be realistic for large numbers and (b) that you can count for that length of time without stopping.


How do you find the domain?

The domain of a function, is the range of input values which will give you a real answer.For example the domain of x+1 would be all real numbers as any number plus 1 will be another real numberThe domain of x0.5 would be all positive numbers as the answer to square root of a negative number is not realNote:x0.5 means the square root of x* * * * *Not quite. A function is a one-to-one or many-to-one mapping from a set S to a set T (which need not be a different set). A function can be one whose domain is all the cars parked in a street and the range is the second character of their registration number.A mathematical function can have the complex field as its domain and range, so a real answer is not a necessary requirement for a function.


How long would it take to count to 1 billion?

About 1,000,000,000 seconds I say it would take longer becasue it would take longer than 1 second to say eg. one million six hundred and twenty four thousand nine hundred and sixty five. So if you timed that for each number it would take a long time. Answer: Although lower numbers (1, 2, 3 etc.) can be said in a second or less, larger numbers like 999,999,999 take up to 5 seconds to say. Assuming that an average value would be 4 seconds the time required would be 4 billion seconds if you didn't stop or rest. This is the same as 127 years.

Related questions

One positive number is 6 less than twice a second number and their product is 140 what are the 2 numbers?

The two numbers are 10 and 14.


Is -20 to the second power equal to -400?

380


How can you compare rational numbers?

Subtract one from the other.If the answer is positive then the first is larger,if the answer is negative, then the second is larger.Rational numbers are numbers that can be expressed as fractions whereas irrational numbers can't be expressed as fractions.


To find the product of 2 or more numbers?

Take two numbers. Throw (the first number) into a box (the second number) times. The total amount in the box is then the product of the two numbers.


How does one complete this problem... Find two positive real numbers whose product is a maximum Q The sum of the first and three times the second is 42?

The problem is complete. There is enough information there for it to be solved.


How do you get a negative answer when subtracting two positive numbers?

Have the second number be greater than the first.


Do you get a positive number when subtracting two negative numbers?

Have the second number be greater than the first.


What is the result of the product of the first three prime numbers minus the sum of the second three prime numbers?

30 - 31 = -1


If you have a product of two numbers and you find the product of the opposites of the numbers you get the same result.?

yes. An opposite number is the negative of a positive number, for example -5 and +5 are opposite numbers. Since minus x plus is minus and plus x minus is minus and plus x plus is plus and minus x minus is plus then the product of opposites is the same.


How do you find the LCM of 2 numbers if one number is prime?

If the second number is a multiple of the prime number, than the LCM is the second number. If the second number is not a multiple of the prime number, then the two numbers are relatively prime, and the LCM is the product of the two numbers.


Why the second partial product is always greater than the first partial product when you multiply two numbers?

The assertion in the question is simply not true.


How many positive four digit numbers have 7 as their second digit and 8 as their last digit?

90