multiply both sides by the lcd then you would take the letter as in x and multiply it by the answer you got and subtract the second answer, then divide both sides by the answer that would be like 3x so u would divide it by 3 on both sides. This may sound confussing to u but if it does then im sorry cuz this stuff is bs.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoWiki User
∙ 12y agoMultiply LCD,then do distributive property,subtract number opossite of variable,then divide variable,flip sign if needed, and then simplify....
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago1/(x+1)(x+2)
The only possible method is: One step at a time.
Assuming you want to get rid of the fractions, you can multiply both sides of the equations by the greatest common factor of the fractions. Then you can solve the equation normally.
You cannot solve a fraction. You can solve a question about fractions, you can carry out basic operations with fractions, convert them from one form to another but none of these is "solving" them.
you can only solve for one in an equation so it can equal something
When you separate the characters in the equation, you see one and seven separated by an X. You can solve the equation by multiplying -- the function of X -- one times seven: the answer is seven.
One-step equation 3x=12 x-6=5 4/x=7 Multistep equation 3x+8=11 x/7+4=6 4x/7=2
an equation that only requires one operation done to solve it or so i believe
You need not have x in an algebraic equation. You solve whichever one is the easiest and that depends on the set of equations that you have.
You solve the two equations simultaneously. There are several ways to do it; one method is to solve the first equation for "x", then replace that in the second equation. This will give you a value for "y". After solving for "y", replace that in any of the two original equations, and solve the remaining equation for "x".You solve the two equations simultaneously. There are several ways to do it; one method is to solve the first equation for "x", then replace that in the second equation. This will give you a value for "y". After solving for "y", replace that in any of the two original equations, and solve the remaining equation for "x".You solve the two equations simultaneously. There are several ways to do it; one method is to solve the first equation for "x", then replace that in the second equation. This will give you a value for "y". After solving for "y", replace that in any of the two original equations, and solve the remaining equation for "x".You solve the two equations simultaneously. There are several ways to do it; one method is to solve the first equation for "x", then replace that in the second equation. This will give you a value for "y". After solving for "y", replace that in any of the two original equations, and solve the remaining equation for "x".
You need another equation to make this a linear equation so you can solve for both variables. One equation with two variables is not enough to determine the correct answer.
You cannot solve one equation in two unknowns.
It is generally not possible to solve a single equation in two variables: this is one such.