The Euclidean Parallel Axiom is as stated below:
If a line segment intersects two straight lines forming two interior angles on the same side that sum to less than two right angles, then the two lines, if extended indefinitely, meet on that side on which the angles sum to less than two right angles.
My source is linked below.
A cylinder includes an infinite number of parallel lines. Every line in the curved surface is parallel to every other one and perpendicular to the two ends. . "A cylinder 2" is meaningless. You would have to look at the homework you're trying to get the answer for to see what cylinder 2 means.
Parallel play is when children play side by side, but do not interact. Cooperative play is when they play in an interactive manner. Both parallel and cooperative play result in mimicry of the other play partner. In both forms of play the children observe the actions of the other.
This quadrilateral is a trapezoid. In a trapezoid, one pair of opposite sides is parallel, and one pair of opposite sides is congruent. The other two sides are not parallel or congruent.
A cut through a right circular cylinder that is perpendicular to its altitude yields a circular cross-section. A right circular cylinder that is cut on a plane not perpendicular to its altitude but also but also not parallel to its altitude will yield an ellipse whose minor axis is the diameter of the cylinder. Trivial cases of a set of parallel lines, a single line, or the empty set occur when the cut is parallel to the altitude, externally tangent to the cylinder, or does not intersect the cylinder, respectively.
The basic constructions required by Euclid's postulates include drawing a straight line between two points, extending a line indefinitely in a straight line, drawing a circle with a given center and radius, constructing a perpendicular bisector of a line segment, and constructing an angle bisector. These constructions are foundational in Euclidean geometry and form the basis for further geometric reasoning.
Euclid's parallel axiom is false in non-Euclidean geometry because non-Euclidean geometry occurs within a different theory of space. There may be one absolute occurrence in non-Euclidean space where Euclid's parallel axiom is valid. Possibly as some form of infinity.
An axiom of Euclidean geometry.
the 5th one
There is a subtle distinction between Euclidean, Hilbert and Non-Euclidean planes. Euclidean planes are those that satisfy the 5 axioms, while Non-Euclidean planes do not satisfy the fifth postulate. This means that in Non-Euclidean planes, given a line and a point not on that line, then there are two (or more) lines that contain that point and are parallel to the original line. There are geometries where there must be exactly one line through that point and parallel to the original line and then there are also geometries where no such line contains that point and is parallel to the original line.Basically, the fifth postulate can be satisfied by multiple geometries.
In Euclidean geometry parallel lines are always the same distance apart. In non-Euclidean geometry parallel lines are not what we think of a parallel. They curve away from or toward each other. Said another way, in Euclidean geometry parallel lines can never cross. In non-Euclidean geometry they can.
Not in Euclidean Geometry. Euclid's 5th axiom is that parallel lines never meet. However, unlike the first 4 axiom, it is impossible to prove the 5th axiom; depending upon the situation, you can either assume that parallel lines meet or don't; when they do meet, there are some very interesting consequences (for example, the possibility of a hyperbolic space). To my knowledge, if they meet, they are intersecting/perpendicular lines.
Yes they are. It is delineated in something called the parallel postulate, and the axiom is also called Euclid's fifth postulate. This is boilerplate Euclidean geometry, and a link can be found below if you'd like to review the particulars.
No. Non-Euclidean geometries usually start with the axiom that Euclid's parallel postulate is not true. This postulate can be shown to be equivalent to the statement that the internal angles of a traingle sum to 180 degrees. Thus, non-Euclidean geometries are based on the proposition that is equivalent to saying that the angles do not add up to 180 degrees.
In Euclidean space, never. But they can in non-Euclidean geometries.
In Euclidean geometry, parallel line are alwayscoplanar.
In Euclidean geometry, they do not meet.
Playfair Axiom