write a program that reads in the size of the side of square and then pints a hollow square of that size out of asterisks and blanks?
x -=y;
write a vb program to find the magic square
Write a program in c++ that take input in a integer matrix of size 4*4 and find out if the entered matrix is diagonal or not.
Reference:cprogramming-bd.com/c_page1.aspx# array programming
write a program that reads in the size of the side of square and then pints a hollow square of that size out of asterisks and blanks?
x -=y;
write a vb program to find the magic square
int first= 1;
Write a program in c++ that take input in a integer matrix of size 4*4 and find out if the entered matrix is diagonal or not.
Reference:cprogramming-bd.com/c_page2.aspx# reverse number
Reference:cprogramming-bd.com/c_page1.aspx# array programming
write a c program to accept a number and generate a square root cube and exponential values
num = InputBox("Enter a number: ","PROGRAM: Square") sumSquare = CInt(num) * CInt(num) MsgBox("The square of " & num & " = " & sumSquare) ===== *NOTE*: The function CInt() is what we use to convert a text string to become a numeric integer value.
I am not sure whether the term "incommensurable" is appropriate here; the official term is "irrational", which means it can't be expressed exactly as a ratio: you can't write a fraction with integer numerator and denominator which is exactlyequal to the square root of 5 (or of any other integer that is not a perfect square) - but you can obviously get very close to the exact value with such a fraction. If you write the square root of 5 as a decimal, you will get an infinite amount of decimal digits, which will not repeat.I am not sure whether the term "incommensurable" is appropriate here; the official term is "irrational", which means it can't be expressed exactly as a ratio: you can't write a fraction with integer numerator and denominator which is exactlyequal to the square root of 5 (or of any other integer that is not a perfect square) - but you can obviously get very close to the exact value with such a fraction. If you write the square root of 5 as a decimal, you will get an infinite amount of decimal digits, which will not repeat.I am not sure whether the term "incommensurable" is appropriate here; the official term is "irrational", which means it can't be expressed exactly as a ratio: you can't write a fraction with integer numerator and denominator which is exactlyequal to the square root of 5 (or of any other integer that is not a perfect square) - but you can obviously get very close to the exact value with such a fraction. If you write the square root of 5 as a decimal, you will get an infinite amount of decimal digits, which will not repeat.I am not sure whether the term "incommensurable" is appropriate here; the official term is "irrational", which means it can't be expressed exactly as a ratio: you can't write a fraction with integer numerator and denominator which is exactlyequal to the square root of 5 (or of any other integer that is not a perfect square) - but you can obviously get very close to the exact value with such a fraction. If you write the square root of 5 as a decimal, you will get an infinite amount of decimal digits, which will not repeat.
$n = 10*(1+10)/2;
Answer: Mixed number Answer: It is neither, in the sense that you can't write the square root of any positive integer (except for the square root of perfect squares) exactly as a fraction. You can only approximate it. In other words, it's an irrational number.