Thomas Malthus, an English economist, is famously known for the theory that the population would eventually outgrow the food supply leading to widespread famine and social collapse. This idea is known as the Malthusian catastrophe.
They originally predicted 500,000. Twenty percent more than 500,000 is 600,000.So the factor of difference here is 1.2. Dividing 600,000 by 1.2 gives 500,000.You cannot take 20% of the final number when the question says 20% more than the original prediction. You must divide the final population by the whole number (ie., 1) and the percentage, not multiply then subtract from the final.So the correct formula is:1.2x = 600,000.x = 600,000 / 1.2x = 500,000
I really don't know but its probably lower than the population of other schools because of the shooting that happened there in 1999. Rachel Scott was one of the first to get shot because it was a nice day out and she decided to write in her journal while eating lunch in front of the school she was the first to get shot when the shooters came. The police went through her backpack, read her journal and some believe she predicted the shooting because in her journal she wrote how she thinks shes going to meet god very soon and how she thinks something bads gonna happen she was very religious as you can tell. The story's really sad though. So if u search up Rachels challenge on google you'll see some links that u can read about her and how she died and her life. It's sad and cool lol. hope i helped. ♥
In the Pangaea Ultima scenario, the Philippines would be located in a supercontinent that is predicted to form in the future. The exact positioning of the Philippines within Pangaea Ultima would depend on how the tectonic plates shift and come together over millions of years.
No, the continents are not moving back into the form of Pangea. The movement of the Earth's tectonic plates is complex and constantly changing. While some continents are moving closer together due to plate tectonics, the formation of a new supercontinent similar to Pangea is not predicted in the near future.
pig benis
The total squared error between the predicted y values and the actual y values
If a data point has a residual of zero, it means that the observed value of the data point matches the value predicted by the regression model. In other words, there is no difference between the actual value and the predicted value for that data point.
population whose members can be predicted
2
In regression analysis, the process for finding the least mean square fit involves minimizing the sum of the squared differences between the observed values and the values predicted by the regression model. This is typically done using mathematical techniques such as the method of least squares, which calculates the coefficients that best fit the data by minimizing the sum of the squared residuals.
The mean sum of squares due to error: this is the sum of the squares of the differences between the observed values and the predicted values divided by the number of observations.
The population is evolving.
Melbourne is not in New Zealand - it is in Australia
because it is dependent upon the world population.
Thomas Malthus, an English economist, is famously known for the theory that the population would eventually outgrow the food supply leading to widespread famine and social collapse. This idea is known as the Malthusian catastrophe.
Yes , it's predicted to go 111 milion to 2050