7
The list that accompanies the question doesn't contain any numbers that could be the lengths of the sides of a triangle.
10
If its a right angle triangle then its side lengths could be 3, 4 and 5
No lengths have been given but in general the sum of the two smaller sides of a triangle must be greater than its largest side.
There's no such thing as the "length of a 30-60-90". The ratios of the lengths of the legs of such a triangle to the length of the hypotenuse are 1/2 and 1/2(sqrt(3).
To represent the lengths of the sides of a triangle, the numbers must satisfy the triangle inequality theorem. This means that the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than the length of the third side. For example, the set of numbers 3, 4, and 5 can represent the sides of a triangle because 3 + 4 > 5, 3 + 5 > 4, and 4 + 5 > 3.
5cm, 5cm, and 5cm could represent the lengths of the sides of an equilateral triangle, or might indicate the length, width, and height of a cube.
If any of its 2 sides is not greater than its third in length then a triangle can't be formed.
Sure, why not?
The list that accompanies the question doesn't contain any numbers that could be the lengths of the sides of a triangle.
Yes and it would be an equilateral triangle.
no it cannot represent as in angle triangle rule it doesnt prove that term
They are triangles. An isosceles triangle has two sides that are equal length, and the other side would be a different length. A right triangle could be an isosceles triangle. On the other hand, a scalene triangle has all of its sides different lengths.
An isosceles triangle has two sides that are equal length, and the other side would be a different length. A right triangle could be an isosceles triangle. On the other hand, a scalene triangle has all of its sides different lengths.
Any triplet provided only that any two lengths are greater than the third.
10
The last side length could be between 4 units and 10 units inclusive.