It is an enlargement
No it is not.
An enlargement but the angle sizes will remain the same.
false
be equidistant from the center of the circle. APEX!
Yes
Certain polygons, yes. Squares, Triangles and Hexagons are all shapes which, in their regular form, can tessellate. Other polygons cannot.
All triangles will tessellate. All quadrilaterals will tessellate There are 15 classes of convex pentagons (the latest discovered in 2015) which will tessellate. Regular hexagons will tessellate. In addition, there are 3 classes of irregular convex hexagons which will tessellate. No convex polygon with 7 or more sides will tessellate.
9
Whatshapes/pictures can create tessellations?Triangles,hexagons & squares.
Six of them.
All triangles will tessellate. All quadrilaterals will tessellate There are 15 classes of convex pentagons (the latest discovered in 2015) which will tessellate. Regular hexagons will tessellate. In addition, there are 3 classes of irregular convex hexagons which will tessellate. No convex polygon with 7 or more sides will tessellate.
First, a hexagon has 6 sides. Second, congruent means the polygons are the same size and shape. Third, regular hexagon means that all of the angles and the same and the lengths of the sides are the same. For my explanation, let's work with squares. If you were to overlap two perfect squares, you would get at 1 area. Rotate one of those squares, and you will get 8 areas, 4 on the inside and 4 on the outside. Since there is also a center area, we have 9 areas. Working with two hexagons would give you 1 or 13 areas. Obviously, adding a third square or hexagon will not achieve 10 areas, so you can stop here. ------ If you overlap 3 hexagons you get 3 sections that are unique to each hexagon 1 section in the middle that is part of each hexagon 3 sections that are shared between only 2 hexagons Those 7 are straightforward - I drew 3 hexagons in powerpoint to visualize it The last 3 are a matter of interpretation, but they are there. it depends on what is meant by "distinct." There are an additional 3 sections that are made up of the outlines of the 3 sections that shared between only two hexagons plus the section in the middle. That gets you to 10. My 2 cents is that this is a poorly worded question because the answer could be 7 or 10 depending on the interpretation of distinct.
By definition, a segment bisector always created two congruent segments.
Translation, rotation, reflection
There can be no such object since it is always possible to create an identical shape and then the two shapes would be congruent.
Yes