1.5m
That depends on what the side lengths are. Until the side lengths are known, the triangle can only be classified as a triangle.
There are not any following lengths in the question to compare. Using the sizes given, and Pythagorean Theorem, the Hypotenuse of the triangle is 36.76 - which will have to do!
use the pathagory intherum
9x + 5
Yes and the given lengths would form an isosceles triangle.
1.5m
These dimensions do not form a triangle.
That depends on what the side lengths are. Until the side lengths are known, the triangle can only be classified as a triangle.
There are not any following lengths in the question to compare. Using the sizes given, and Pythagorean Theorem, the Hypotenuse of the triangle is 36.76 - which will have to do!
18
No. With the given side lengths the sum of the two shorter sides do not exceed the length of the longest side and would not meet to form a triangle
Yes.
use the pathagory intherum
The triangle with side lengths of 2m, 4m, and 7m does not form a valid triangle. In a triangle, the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than the length of the third side according to the Triangle Inequality Theorem. In this case, 2m + 4m is less than 7m, violating the theorem. Therefore, a triangle with these side lengths cannot exist in Euclidean geometry.
Any triangle whose sides are in the same ratio with the corresponding sides of ABC.
The sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is greater than the length of the third side.