Yes, an isosceles triangle with two size lengths of 3 and one of 8 :)
1.5m
That depends on what the side lengths are. Until the side lengths are known, the triangle can only be classified as a triangle.
There are not any following lengths in the question to compare. Using the sizes given, and Pythagorean Theorem, the Hypotenuse of the triangle is 36.76 - which will have to do!
use the pathagory intherum
9x + 5
Yes and the given lengths would form an isosceles triangle.
1.5m
These dimensions do not form a triangle.
That depends on what the side lengths are. Until the side lengths are known, the triangle can only be classified as a triangle.
There are not any following lengths in the question to compare. Using the sizes given, and Pythagorean Theorem, the Hypotenuse of the triangle is 36.76 - which will have to do!
18
No. With the given side lengths the sum of the two shorter sides do not exceed the length of the longest side and would not meet to form a triangle
Yes.
Yes, a triangle can have side lengths of 6, 8, and 9. To determine if these lengths can form a triangle, we can apply the triangle inequality theorem, which states that the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than the length of the third side. In this case, 6 + 8 > 9, 6 + 9 > 8, and 8 + 9 > 6 all hold true, confirming that a triangle can indeed be formed with these side lengths.
use the pathagory intherum
The triangle with side lengths of 2m, 4m, and 7m does not form a valid triangle. In a triangle, the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than the length of the third side according to the Triangle Inequality Theorem. In this case, 2m + 4m is less than 7m, violating the theorem. Therefore, a triangle with these side lengths cannot exist in Euclidean geometry.
Any triangle whose sides are in the same ratio with the corresponding sides of ABC.