That depends on what the side lengths are. Until the side lengths are known, the triangle can only be classified as a triangle.
Yes, an isosceles triangle with two size lengths of 3 and one of 8 :)
use the pathagory intherum
If its a right angle triangle then its side lengths could be 3, 4 and 5
11, 4, 8
side lengths
The triangle with side lengths of 2m, 4m, and 7m does not form a valid triangle. In a triangle, the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than the length of the third side according to the Triangle Inequality Theorem. In this case, 2m + 4m is less than 7m, violating the theorem. Therefore, a triangle with these side lengths cannot exist in Euclidean geometry.
Yes and the given lengths would form an isosceles triangle.
These dimensions do not form a triangle.
That depends on what the side lengths are. Until the side lengths are known, the triangle can only be classified as a triangle.
No. It is not possible, because a triangle cannot have a side longer than the sum of two other sides. 5 is greater than 2+2. Therefore the triangle cannot exist.
Yes, an isosceles triangle with two size lengths of 3 and one of 8 :)
No. With the given side lengths the sum of the two shorter sides do not exceed the length of the longest side and would not meet to form a triangle
Yes.
use the pathagory intherum
Any triangle whose sides are in the same ratio with the corresponding sides of ABC.
No, segments 1, 8, and 8 cannot form a triangle. In order for three segments to form a triangle, the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than the length of the third side. In this case, 1 + 8 is equal to 9, which is not greater than 8. Therefore, a triangle cannot be formed.