The set of whole numbers is infinite; hence, the number of rectangles that meet your specifications is infinite, as well. Are you sure you have the question right?
5
More than one unique triangle exists with the given side lengths.
No. The circular shape makes it impossible to have parallel lines just as you cannot have parallel lines in a circle that both reach the length of the diameter of the said circle.
The hypotenuse is always the longest side so the triangle, as described, cannot exist.
Yes. A pentagonal pyramid is a pyramid with a 5 sided base. Pyramids can be drawn with all different bases
5
If you mean whole 'numbers', then here are the rectangles:1 x 362 x 183 x 124 x 96 x 6(That last one is a square, which is a special rectangle.)
Yes
Invisible since they do not exist! Nothing can have an area of 1500 ft since feet are units of measurement for length, not area.
Length x Width: 1 x 36, 2 x 18, 3 x 12, 4 x 9, 6 x 6, 9 x 4, 12 x 3, 18 x 2 and 36 x 1. There are 9 described above but the last four are quarter-rotations of the first four, so 5 is a more reasonable answer.
No. Isotopes exist because atoms with the same number of protons per nucleus can have differing numbers of neutrons per nucleus.
Two dimensional means it exist in only two dimensions, length and height. In geometry, some examples of two dimensional figures are; circles, squares, rectangles, and any polygon. The only conventional dimension these figures do not have is depth.
Yes, they are: they do exist. Yes, they are: they do exist. Yes, they are: they do exist. Yes, they are: they do exist.
Isotopes have the same number of protons an electrons; the number of neutrons is different.
Isotopes have the same number of protons and electrons; the number of neutrons is different.
No, there is no limit to how many numbers exist. In other words, there are infinitely many.
It does not.If you consider a right angled triangle with minor sides of length 1 unit each, then the Pythagorean theorem shows the third side (the hypotenuse) is sqrt(2) units in length. So the theorem proves that a side of such a length does exist. However, it does not prove that the answer is irrational. The same applies for some other irrational numbers.