-- The area of each little square is 1 square meter. -- The area of the big square is 9 square meters. -- So 9 little ones will cover the big one. Note: If the big one wasn't in the shape of a 3m x 3m square or a 1m x 9m rectangle, then you might have to cut up some of the little ones to make them fit the shape, but even so, 9 of them would exactly cover the bigger shape.
the diameter of a circle with the radius of 9m is 18m
To find the area of a triangle, use the following formula:A = 1/2 ( b * h )whereas, variable b = base and h = height.A = 1/2 ( 18 * 20 )A = 1/2 ( 360 )A = 180 m3
A girl 1.2 m in height is 25 m away from a tower 18 m high. What value is the angle of elevation of the top of the tower from her eyes?
Rectangles are really simple. The perimeter is twice the length plus twice the width (in this case 4m x 2 = 8m, 5m x 2 = 10m, and 8m + 10m = 18m). The area is simply the length times the width (in this case, 4m x 5m = 20m2).
216 square meters.
20*18 = 360 square meters (m2).
18 meters is equal to 1800 centimeters.
18 meters is 1,800 centimeters.
The perimeter of 4 meters by 5 meters is 18. Is the figure a square? if it is then the answer is 18m squared. The first answer is correct if the shape is a parallelogram; the second is rubbish. A square cannot be 4m by 5 m because one of the defining characteristics of a square is that its sides are the same length! The perimeter is the length (therefore metres, NOT m sq) around the shape. 4m+5m+4m+5m = 18m.
(36m^2)*(0.5m) = 18m^3
18m
To calculate the speed, divide the distance by the time taken. In this case, 18m/12min = 1.5 meters per minute.
A circle with a radius (d/2) of 9 meters has a circumference of 56.5 meters.
There are 18 meters in 1800 centimeters. This conversion is done by dividing the number of centimeters by 100 since there are 100 centimeters in one meter.
None, since there can be no conversion. A metre is a measure of length in 1-dimensional space while a square yard is a measure of area in 2-dimensional space. The two measure different characteristics and, according to the most basic principles of dimensional analysis, any attempt at comparisons or conversions between the two are fundamentally flawed.
1800