it make 3 triangles
square
No, a trapezoid does not have 4 equal sides.
It isn't really a square if it has no equal sides. A trapezoid can be drawn that has no equal sides, some can have two sides equal. Quadrilaterals include those 4-sided shapes with no sides equal but they also include all other 4-sided shapes. You would need to specify "Quadrilateral with no equal sides".
yes you can put a trapezoid on top and the bottom but upside down and the one on the side put it side ways so you have 4 trapezoids Would you trust an answer that isn't even punctuated? Not that it would make any sense even if it were. The question says "a trapezoid"; that means one, not four. Probably the easiest method is to divide the trapezoid into 2 equal parts, then divide each of these into 2 equal parts. Bisect the parallel sides, then connect the midpoints forming 2 new trapezoids each half the size of the original. The bases of each are equal and each is the same height. Repeat the procedure for each of the new trapezoids. All 4 will be equal in area, but they won't be congruent (equal in shape).
No, a cut cannot be made between two parallel sides of an isosceles trapezoid to create two isosceles trapezoids. An isosceles trapezoid has only one pair of parallel sides, so cutting between them would result in two separate shapes, neither of which would be an isosceles trapezoid. The resulting shapes would likely be irregular quadrilaterals or triangles, depending on the location of the cut.
square
No, a trapezoid does not have 4 equal sides.
Trapezoid.
It isn't really a square if it has no equal sides. A trapezoid can be drawn that has no equal sides, some can have two sides equal. Quadrilaterals include those 4-sided shapes with no sides equal but they also include all other 4-sided shapes. You would need to specify "Quadrilateral with no equal sides".
yes you can put a trapezoid on top and the bottom but upside down and the one on the side put it side ways so you have 4 trapezoids Would you trust an answer that isn't even punctuated? Not that it would make any sense even if it were. The question says "a trapezoid"; that means one, not four. Probably the easiest method is to divide the trapezoid into 2 equal parts, then divide each of these into 2 equal parts. Bisect the parallel sides, then connect the midpoints forming 2 new trapezoids each half the size of the original. The bases of each are equal and each is the same height. Repeat the procedure for each of the new trapezoids. All 4 will be equal in area, but they won't be congruent (equal in shape).
If it is a normal trapezoid, 2 sides would be equal (the left and right sides).
No, because then it would be a parallelogram.
No, because in that case it would be a parallelogram.
No because otherwise it would be a rectangle
No, a cut cannot be made between two parallel sides of an isosceles trapezoid to create two isosceles trapezoids. An isosceles trapezoid has only one pair of parallel sides, so cutting between them would result in two separate shapes, neither of which would be an isosceles trapezoid. The resulting shapes would likely be irregular quadrilaterals or triangles, depending on the location of the cut.
No, the length of the midsegment of a trapezoid is equal to the average of the lengths of the bases. The sum of the lengths of the bases would typically yield a longer length than the midsegment.
That shape would be a trapezoid.