Oh, dude, let me break it down for you. So, 14 kilometers is like way longer than 140 meters. Like, imagine going for a leisurely stroll for 14 kilometers versus just walking down the street for 140 meters. It's like comparing a road trip to a quick jaunt to the corner store. So yeah, they're definitely not the same length.
Chat with our AI personalities
Well, isn't that a happy little question! Let's think about it together. 14 kilometers is actually much longer than 140 meters. You see, there are 1,000 meters in a kilometer, so 14 kilometers is equal to 14,000 meters. Just a little bit of happy math to brighten your day!
No, 14 kilometers is not the same length as 140 meters. One kilometer is equal to 1000 meters, so 14 kilometers is equal to 14,000 meters. Therefore, 14 km is significantly longer than 140 meters.
168 km². Area of rectangle = Length*Breadth = 13*7 = 91 km² Area of triangle = 1/2*Base*Height = 1/2*14*11 = 77 km² Area of figure = Area of rectangle + Area of triangle = 91+77 = 168 km²
This question cannot be answered sensibly. A square km is a measure of area, with dimensions [L2]. A length has dimensions [L]. Basic dimensional analysis teaches that you cannot convert between measures with different dimensions such as these without additional information. It is not possible to determine the perimeter of the rectangle either. Assuming the length is greater than the breadth, the length can have any value at all as long as it is at least equal to sqrt(319) km ie 17.86 km. Consequently the perimeter can be any value greater than (or equal to) 4 times the square root of 319 (in km). Length = 17.85 km gives breadth = 17.85 km and perimeter = 71.44 km or length = 178.5 km, breadth = 1.785 km and perimeter = 360.78 km or length = 1785 km, breadth =0.1785 km and perimeter = 3572.5 km etc.
The length of India from north to south is 3,050 km (1,900 mi) from east to west it is 2,950 km (1,830 mi).
The resultant is 2 km South.
The circumference of a circle with a diameter of 16 km is: 50.3 km