No a square is not a trapezoid
Chat with our AI personalities
A square may or may not be a trapezoid, or trapezium. That's because there is a bit of a difference of opinion as to the definition of a trapezoid. One definition of the trapezoid is that is has one pair of parallel sides. The square meets this condition. Another definition of the trapezoid is that is has exactly one pair of parallel sides. The square cannot meet that definition because it has two pairs of parallel sides.
No, a trapezoid cannot be a square. Want me to include reasons? Just send me a message.
A square can't be a trapezoid because it has two parellel sizes.
Quadrelateral
'A square is a type of rectangle, a rectangle is a type of paralellogram, a paralellogram is a type of trapezoid, a trapezoid is a type of quadrilateral.
Trapezoid. The rectangle, square, and rhombus are all parallelograms. The Trapezoid is a solid: a prism of trapezium cross-section.
Nope A square is a parallelogram By definition a trapezoid is a quadrilateral with only one pair of sides parallel