Oh, dude, like technically speaking, all rectangles are trapezoids, but not all trapezoids are rectangles. It's like saying all squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. So, yeah, some trapezoids can be rectangles, but not all of them. It's like a geometry mind game, man.
false
No, a quadrilateral isn't always a trapezoid. One way to consider it is that all trapezoids are quadrilaterals (four-sided shapes), but not all quadrilaterals are trapezoids. Some quadrilaterals are concave quadrilaterals, some are scalene convex quadrilaterals (called trapezoids in the UK), some would be trapezoids, and some would be parallelograms (rectangles, squares, rhomboids, rhombi). If parallelograms are considered a special case of trapezoids, then trapezoids would include all non-scalene convex quadrilaterals, which is a highly inclusive definition.
We don't know who said that, but it's not true. Some quadrilaterals are trapezoidsand some aren't.A quadrilateral is any drawing with four sides.A trapezoid is any drawing with four sides and two of the sides are parallel.So all trapezoids are quadrilaterals. But there are a lot of other quadrilateralsthat aren't trapezoids.
False. It is proven to be true IF some axioms are assumed to be true. A mathematical statement can be proven to be true only after some axioms have been assumed.
Oh, dude, like technically speaking, all rectangles are trapezoids, but not all trapezoids are rectangles. It's like saying all squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. So, yeah, some trapezoids can be rectangles, but not all of them. It's like a geometry mind game, man.
false
True when they are in the form of rectangles.
yes. rectangles are just the special cases of parallelograms where the angles are all 900
Squares, rectangles, and some trapezoids.
True. All rectangles are trapezoids. (In England a trapezoid is known as a trapezium.)
false
false
No, a quadrilateral isn't always a trapezoid. One way to consider it is that all trapezoids are quadrilaterals (four-sided shapes), but not all quadrilaterals are trapezoids. Some quadrilaterals are concave quadrilaterals, some are scalene convex quadrilaterals (called trapezoids in the UK), some would be trapezoids, and some would be parallelograms (rectangles, squares, rhomboids, rhombi). If parallelograms are considered a special case of trapezoids, then trapezoids would include all non-scalene convex quadrilaterals, which is a highly inclusive definition.
No, a quadrilateral isn't always a trapezoid. One way to consider it is that all trapezoids are quadrilaterals (four-sided shapes), but not all quadrilaterals are trapezoids. Some quadrilaterals are concave quadrilaterals, some are scalene convex quadrilaterals (called trapezoids in the UK), some would be trapezoids, and some would be parallelograms (rectangles, squares, rhomboids, rhombi). If parallelograms are considered a special case of trapezoids, then trapezoids would include all non-scalene convex quadrilaterals, which is a highly inclusive definition.
True
Yes.