answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

chloe

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What 2d shape has 4 sides and 3 vertices?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What 2D shape with 3 sides?

A triangle as no other 2d shape can have 3 sides.


Which as more vertices a shape with 4 sides or a shape with 3 sides?

Assuming that each vertex is used to connect exactly two sides, all two-dimensional shapes will have the same number of sides as vertices. So a shape with 4 sides will have 4 vertices and a shape with 3 sides will have 3 vertices. Think of a square (4 sides, 4 vertices) and a triangle (3 sides, 3 vertices).


Which has more vertices a shape with 4sides or a shape with 3 sides?

A shape with four sides has four vertices and a shape with three sides has three vertices, so a shape with four sides has more vertices than a shape with three sides.


What 2D-shape has 3 edges and 3 vertices?

Definately a triangle


Which has more verticles a shape with 4 sides or a shape with 3 sides?

A 4 sided shape has 4 vertices whereas a 3 sided shape has 3 vertices.


How many sides will a shape with 3 vertices have?

3 sides


What 2d shape has 3 sides?

A triangle


A shape with 4 sides and 3 vertices?

need to see a pic of a shape with 4 sides and 3 vertices can you supply one


Which has more vertices a shapr with 4 sides or a shape with 3 sides?

A 4 sided shape which is a quadrilateral has more vertices than a 3 sided shape which is a triangle


Which has more vertices a shape with 4 sides or a shape with 3 sides?

A shape with four sides has more vertices because there are more points where edges (straight lines) meet than a 3-sided shape.


What is a 2d shape with 3 sides?

One answer is triangle


What has six sides and four vertices?

Since the number of sides and vertices is different, it cannot be a 2-dimensional shape. The only 3-dimensional shape with 4 vertices is a tetrahedron and that does not have 6 sides. Consequently, there is no such shape.