0
What else can I help you with?
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc def by asa?
Angle "A" is congruent to Angle "D"
What else would need to congruent to show that abc is congruent to xyz by asa?
angle B angle Y (Tested, correct) Nicki is not the answer, just ignore that.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc xyz by aas?
It's actually angle B angle Y
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc congruent xyz by SAS?
__ - __ AC = XZ = is the similar sign
What else would need to be congruent to show abc is congruent to def by AAS?
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc def by asa?
Angle "A" is congruent to Angle "D"
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc xyz by sas?
Line segment BC is congruent to Line Segment YZ
What else would need to congruent to show that abc is congruent to xyz by asa?
angle B angle Y (Tested, correct) Nicki is not the answer, just ignore that.
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle XYZ by Angle Side Angle?
Without seeing the picture, I can't tell what's already known to be congruent, so there's no way I can figure out what 'else' is needed.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc xyz by aas?
It's actually angle B angle Y
What else would need to be congruent to show that jkl mno by aas?
AAS is equal to angle-angle-side, and is descriptive of a triangle. JKL and MNO would be the sides and angles of a triangle. The two sides must be congruent to the opposite angle.
Can you show that two triangles are congruent by angle-angle-angle?
No, because they need not be congruent.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc congruent xyz by SAS?
__ - __ AC = XZ = is the similar sign
What else would need to be congruent to show that ABCis congruent toXYZ by SAS?
The answer depends on what is already known about the two triangles.
What else would need to congruent to show that abc equals pqr by sss?
That depends on which sides have not been proven congruent yet.
What else would need to be congruent to show that efg jkl by sss?
For a start, you would need to know what efg and jkl are.
What else would need to be congruent to show abc is congruent to def by AAS?
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
