0
What else would need to congruent to show that abc is congruent to xyz by asa?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
angle B angle Y
(Tested, correct)
Nicki is not the answer, just ignore that.
laceleafcanopy
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoangle B angle Y
laceleafcanopy
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What else would need to be congruent to show that efg is congruent to hij by sss?
SSS is enough to show congruence.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc congruent xyz by SAS?
__ - __ AC = XZ = is the similar sign
What else would need to be congruent to show that stu jkl by sas?
Su jL
What else would need to be congruent to show that efg pqr by asa?
bc yz
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc def by asa?
Angle "A" is congruent to Angle "D"
What else would need to be congruent to show that efg is congruent to hij by sss?
SSS is enough to show congruence.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc congruent xyz by SAS?
__ - __ AC = XZ = is the similar sign
What else would need to be congruent to show that ABCis congruent toXYZ by SAS?
The answer depends on what is already known about the two triangles.
What else would need to be congruent to show that stu jkl by sas?
Su jL
What else would need to be congruent to show that efg pqr by asa?
bc yz
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc pqr by sss?
Bc= qr
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc def by asa?
Angle "A" is congruent to Angle "D"
What else would need to be congruent to show that efg jkl by sss?
For a start, you would need to know what efg and jkl are.
What else would need to congruent to show that abc equals pqr by sss?
That depends on which sides have not been proven congruent yet.
What else would need to be congruent to show abc is congruent to def by AAS?
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle abc equals xyz by sas?
bh=ws
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle abc is congruent to xyz by SAS?
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
