bh=ws
Without seeing the picture, I can't tell what's already known to be congruent, so there's no way I can figure out what 'else' is needed.
Every triangle must have either 2 or else 3 acute angles. The least possible is 2.
I believe you need 2 pieces of data (either an angle or another length) before you can calculate anything about the triangle. Anyone else can correct me if I'm wrong.
2/8 equals 1/4 which is 0.25 or 25%. Anything else? ;D
No way to answer this until we know either the value of 'X', or else something about the drawing.
Nicki Minaj
D). Eg = hj
Without seeing the picture, I can't tell what's already known to be congruent, so there's no way I can figure out what 'else' is needed.
To show that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle XYZ by the Angle-Angle-Side (AAS) criterion, you would need to establish that one pair of corresponding sides is congruent. Specifically, you need to demonstrate that one side of triangle ABC is congruent to the corresponding side of triangle XYZ, in addition to having two angles in triangle ABC congruent to two angles in triangle XYZ. This combination of two angles and the included side would satisfy the AAS condition for congruence.
To show that triangle JKL is congruent to triangle MNO by the Angle-Angle-Side (AAS) theorem, you need to establish that two angles and the non-included side of triangle JKL are congruent to two angles and the corresponding non-included side of triangle MNO. Specifically, you would need to verify that one of the angles in triangle JKL is congruent to one of the angles in triangle MNO, and that the side opposite the angle in triangle JKL is congruent to the corresponding side in triangle MNO. This would complete the necessary conditions for AAS congruence.
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
That depends on which sides have not been proven congruent yet.
"Congruent" means "same shape and size as the other one". So one thing all by itself is never congruent. It needs something else to be congruent with. An isosceles triangle is never congruent to a scalene triangle, sometimes congruent to any other kind of triangle, and always congruent to another isosceles triangle that's congruent to the first one.
To show that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle XYZ by the ASA (Angle-Side-Angle) criterion, we need to establish that two angles in triangle ABC are congruent to two angles in triangle XYZ, along with the side that is included between those angles being congruent. Specifically, if we have ∠A ≅ ∠X, ∠B ≅ ∠Y, and side AB ≅ XY, then the triangles can be concluded as congruent by ASA. Thus, we would need to confirm the congruence of these angles and the included side.
congruent means that all the sides are the same length. the sides of a square have to be the same length or else it would be a rectangle. Not all triangles are congruent though. there are other types of triangles unlike the square, where there is only one type.
it is impossible* * * * * Although it is impossible to have a triangle with no sides or angles congruent to anything else in the 2-d world, I suggest that the answer to this question is a scalene triangle.
AAS is equal to angle-angle-side, and is descriptive of a triangle. JKL and MNO would be the sides and angles of a triangle. The two sides must be congruent to the opposite angle.