answersLogoWhite

0

400 would have been a leap year.

The method for calculating leap years is a little complicated due to all the exceptions.

Years that are a multiple of 4 are a leap year, UNLESS the year is a multiple of 100 (then it is not a leap year), UNLESS the year is also a multiple of 400 (then it is a leap year).

Some examples

1800 - not a leap year because it is a multiple of 100

1900 - not a leap year because it is a multiple of 100

2000 - leap year because while it is a multiple of 100, it is also a multiple of 400

2100 - not a leap year because it is a multiple of 100

400 - leap year because while it is a multiple of 100, it is also a multiple of 400

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
JordanJordan
Looking for a career mentor? I've seen my fair share of shake-ups.
Chat with Jordan
JudyJudy
Simplicity is my specialty.
Chat with Judy

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why 400 is not a leap year detailed answer needed?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp