most of the raw materials used in industries are agricultural raw materials.........
the industries manufacture pesticides,fertilizers, etc which are used in agricultural activities
Since you didn't include the statements in your question there is no way for us to know
True. The first statement is true and the second statement is false. In a disjunction, if either statement is true, the disjunction is true.
Yes. That is what theorems are for. Once proven, their results do not need to be justified again (except for exams).
A reason that cannot be used to justify a statement in a proof is an unsupported assumption or opinion. For example, stating that "because I believe it's true" lacks empirical or logical backing and does not adhere to the standards of formal reasoning. Proofs require verifiable evidence, established theorems, or axioms, rather than personal beliefs or unsubstantiated claims.
In a proof, statements that are purely opinion-based or subjective, such as personal beliefs or interpretations, cannot be used to justify steps. Additionally, unsupported assertions that lack logical reasoning or empirical evidence, as well as circular reasoning where the conclusion is included in one of the premises, are also invalid. Lastly, statements that are not universally accepted or established laws, such as conjectures that have not been proven, cannot justify proof steps.
building economics is considered as an irrelevant subjectcin the construction industry. justify the statement above
The statement was intended to justify a social welfare policy that aims to address income inequality and support those in need.
imperialism
do you agree with the author s statement at the end of the text? what scientific explanation or concept do you know that may justify the statement?
Business communication is often termed as the lifeblood of business concern justify this statement with an example?
"Accounting Equation is true under all circumstances." Justify this statement with the help of examples.
"Accounting Equation is true under all circumstances." Justify this statement with the help of five illustrations.
And what information do you have to justify the statement?
conclusion
yes
The CPU is what "thinks" about everything.
The concept of competitve advantage is as important for non- profit orgnizations as it is for profit orgnizatios Do you agree with this statement or not? Explain with examples to justify your answer.