Since you didn't include the statements in your question there is no way for us to know
True. The first statement is true and the second statement is false. In a disjunction, if either statement is true, the disjunction is true.
Yes. That is what theorems are for. Once proven, their results do not need to be justified again (except for exams).
It means give logical reasons for whatever you are trying to justify.
It isn't clear what you want to justify.
building economics is considered as an irrelevant subjectcin the construction industry. justify the statement above
The statement was intended to justify a social welfare policy that aims to address income inequality and support those in need.
imperialism
do you agree with the author s statement at the end of the text? what scientific explanation or concept do you know that may justify the statement?
Business communication is often termed as the lifeblood of business concern justify this statement with an example?
And what information do you have to justify the statement?
conclusion
"Accounting Equation is true under all circumstances." Justify this statement with the help of five illustrations.
"Accounting Equation is true under all circumstances." Justify this statement with the help of examples.
yes
The CPU is what "thinks" about everything.
The concept of competitve advantage is as important for non- profit orgnizations as it is for profit orgnizatios Do you agree with this statement or not? Explain with examples to justify your answer.