1/3 is not an integer, and there is no such thing as an interger. An integer is a whole number.
As much as, in these days of uncertainty, anything can be anything. As long as the constraints of a rational number are kept to, a rational number will always remain a rational number.
Yes.
Yes, but only if the rational number is 0.
Only if the rational number is 0.
It is a rational number but not an integer.
7 is a real number, as it represents a quantity on the number line. It is also a rational number, as it can be expressed as the ratio of two integers (7/1). Additionally, 7 is an integer, as it is a whole number without a fractional or decimal part. In summary, 7 is a real number, a rational number, and an integer.
As a rational number. A terminating decimal fraction.
No, integers are whole numbers- 1,2,3,4,5...
Yes because it can also be expressed as a fraction in the form of 89/100
No integers are irrational numbers. An integer is a whole number, positive or negative. This means they have no decimals or fractions. An irrational number, however, is a number with fractions or decimals. Therefor, there are no integers that are irrational numbers.
7 is a whole number, six is an interger.
1/3 is not an integer, and there is no such thing as an interger. An integer is a whole number.
It is a rational number. It can be written as a fraction.
yes
An integer (not interger!) sequence is an ordered set of numbers such that each number in the set is an integer, or a whole number.
Is 12.05 a rational number or irrational number?