Yes.
39 and 45 are not relatively prime because they have 3 as a common factor. Relatively prime numbers have no common factor greater than 1.
No, they are not.
no
No.
Yes.
The LCM of 32 and 45 is 1440. 32 and 45 have no common factors. We call this relatively prime. When you have relatively prime numbers, their LCM is their product.Since 32 and 45 share no common factors, the LCM would be 32*45 = 1440.
No, 45 and 84 are not relatively prime.
No, they are not relatively prime.
Numbers are either prime or they aren't. In this case, 45 is divisible by 3 and 15; sixty-four goes into 2, 4, 8 and 32. The term "relatively prime" compares two numbers and their common factors. If the GCF of the two numbers is 1, then they are "relatively prime."
It can be. 21 is relatively prime with 32.
Yes, 45 and 64 are relatively prime because they do not share any prime factors.
The GCF of 32 and 45 is 1. One way to determine the greatest common factor is to find all the factors of the numbers and compare them. The factors of 32 are 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32. The factors of 45 are 1, 3, 5, 9, 15, and 45. The common factors are 1. Therefore, 1 is the greatest common factor, which means they are relatively prime. The greatest common factor can also be calculated by identifying the common prime factors and multiplying them together. The prime factors of 32 are 2, 2, 2, 2, and 2. The prime factors of 45 are 3, 3, and 5. They have no prime factors in common, so they are relatively prime.
39 and 45 are not relatively prime because they have 3 as a common factor. Relatively prime numbers have no common factor greater than 1.
Since the GCF of 45 and 56 is 1, they are relatively prime.
No, they are not.
No, they are not.