Yes, 45 and 64 are relatively prime because they do not share any prime factors.
22 is not relatively prime
No, 64 and 144 are not relatively prime. To be relatively prime, the only common factor they could have would be 1. They have other common factors such as 2, 4, 8 and 16.
Yes. 45: 3 x 3 x 5 64: 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 Because there are no common factors, the two numbers are said to be relatively prime.
The LCM is 5184. The numbers 81 and 64 have no common factors. When you have two relatively prime numbers, you find their LCM by multiplying them. So 5184 is 81x64.
Yes, 45 and 64 are relatively prime because they do not share any prime factors.
45 and 64 are not prime numbers because they both have more than two factors
Their GCF is 1.
Their GCF is 1.
Honey, 45 and 84 are about as prime as a grocery store avocado. They share a common factor of 3, so they are not relatively prime. It's like trying to mix oil and water - just not gonna work out.
22 is not relatively prime
No, they are not relatively prime.
39 and 45 are not relatively prime because they have 3 as a common factor. Relatively prime numbers have no common factor greater than 1.
No, 64 and 144 are not relatively prime. To be relatively prime, the only common factor they could have would be 1. They have other common factors such as 2, 4, 8 and 16.
Since the GCF of 45 and 56 is 1, they are relatively prime.
Yes. 45: 3 x 3 x 5 64: 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 Because there are no common factors, the two numbers are said to be relatively prime.
No, they are not.