No. Parallelograms are never trapezoids because in order to be a parallelogram there has to be two sets of parallel sides. A trapezoid only has one set of parallel sides.
Yes of course! :)
No, trapezoids are not parallelograms. A trapezoid is defined as a quadrilateral with at least one pair of parallel sides, while a parallelogram has two pairs of parallel sides. Therefore, while some trapezoids may appear similar to parallelograms, they do not meet the criteria to be classified as such.
No but all parallelograms are trapezoids
No, but all parallelograms are trapezoids.
No. All rhombi (rhombuses) are parallelograms but all parallelograms are not rhombi.
Yes of course! :)
All squares are parallelograms, but all parallelograms are not squares.
No trapezoids are parallelograms, and no parallelograms are trapezoids.
No trapezoids are parallelograms, and no parallelograms are trapezoids.
No but all parallelograms are trapezoids
No, but all parallelograms are trapezoids.
No. All rhombi (rhombuses) are parallelograms but all parallelograms are not rhombi.
By definition, all squares are parallelograms. Not all parallelograms, however, are squares. All rectangles and rhombuses are also parallelograms.
No trapezoids are parallelograms, and no parallelograms are trapezoids.
It is NOT as case of 'Some'. It is ALL rectangles are parallelograms.
No. Parallelograms are never trapezoids. Trapezoids are never parallelograms.
Yes all squares are parallelograms but not all parallelograms are squares.