answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Are any irrational number is always a non repeating and non terminating decimals?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is rational number sometimes never or always repeating?

If you consider terminating decimals as ones that end in repeating 0s, then the answer is "always".


Is an irrational number always a non-repeating and non-terminating decimal number?

Yes.


What number is rational 12 14 0.76 or pie?

Pie is always regarded as an irrational no. 12140.76 is rational as it is a terminating no. Irrational no. is always non-terminating and non repeating. example- Square root 2 , pie etc.


Are terminating decimals always rational numbers?

Yes, terminating decimals are always rational numbers.


A repeating decimal is an irrational number?

Actually, a repeating decimal is not necessarily an irrational number. A repeating decimal is a decimal number that has a repeating pattern of digits after the decimal point. While some repeating decimals can be irrational, such as 0.1010010001..., others can be rational, like 0.3333... which is equal to 1/3. Irrational numbers are numbers that cannot be expressed as a simple fraction, and they have non-repeating, non-terminating decimal representations.


Are decimals in a fraction always rational numbers?

There are are three types of decimals: terminating, repeating and non-terminating/non-repeating. The first two are rational, the third is not.


Is a fraction always a rational number?

No, a fraction such as 22/7 (approximately pi), is a non-terminating, non-repeating fraction, making it irrational.


Why are terminating decimals rational numbers?

they always are.


Are terminating decimals always sometimes or never a rational number?

always!


Are irrational numbers always non terminating?

yes


What is a counterexample to show that the repeating decimals are closed under subtraction false?

In fact, the statement is true. Consequently, there is not a proper counterexample. The fallacy is in asserting that a terminating decimal is not a repeating decimal. First, there is the trivial argument that any terminating decimal can be written with a repeating string of trailing zeros. But, Cantor or Dedekind (I can't remember which) proved that any terminating decimal can also be expressed as a repeating decimal. For example, 2.35 can be written as 2.3499... Or 150,000 as 149,999.99... Thus, a terminating decimal becomes a recurring decimal. As a consequence, all real numbers can be expressed as infinite decimals. And that proves closure under addition.


Are terminating decimals always nether or sometimes a rational numbers?

They are always rational numbers.