No.
The cube root of this number is 1 more than the smallest prime?
8 if 1 is included as a prime number or 27
No.
Yes, a number can have more than one cube root, but the situation varies depending on whether we are considering real or complex numbers. In the realm of real numbers, every non-zero number has one real cube root. However, in the context of complex numbers, every number has three distinct cube roots due to the properties of complex exponentiation. For example, the cube roots of 1 are 1, ( \frac{-1 + \sqrt{3}i}{2} ), and ( \frac{-1 - \sqrt{3}i}{2} ).
To find a number that, when cubed, is greater than 600 but less than 800, we can test the cube roots. The cube root of 600 is approximately 8.43, and the cube root of 800 is about 9.28. Thus, a number like 9 will work, as (9^3 = 729), which is between 600 and 800.
The cube root of this number is 1 more than the smallest prime?
The cube root of this number is one more than the smallest prime
8 if 1 is included as a prime number or 27
No.
6859. Cube root of 9999 is 21.54, so find the largest prime number less than that (19), then cube that number. 19^3=6,859
729
There are two integer answers : 6 and 7. Any value between 5.848 (cube root of 200) and 7.368 (cube root of 400) will satisfy the question.
You need to find the cube root of XTake any number (Y) and cube it.* ....If it is smaller than X, add 2 to Y and cube thatnumber. Repeat that process until you get a cube which is larger than X. Subtract 1 from the last number you cubed and cube that number. This will give you either the exact X you were looking for, or a very close number. * .... If it is larger than X, subtract 2 and cube that number. Repeat until you get a cube which is smaller than X. Add 1 the last number you cubed and cube that number. This will give you either the exact X you were looking for, or a very close number.If you get to "a very close number" then you are seeking a root which will be fractional, and you need to repeat the process above with decimal places.* .... if the cube root of 'the very close number' is Z, add .5 to Z and cube that, and continue fine-tuning the decimal places until you get so close as to make little difference to the result.
216, 343
It is 64 because 4*4*4 = 64
No, not always since: if a number is more than 1, then its square root is smaller than the number. if a number is less than 1, then its square root is bigger than the number.
The smallest prime is 2. One more than the smallest prime is 2+1=3. The cube root of 27 is 3 (because 3*3*3=27). So the answer is 27.