The y-intercept is the value of the function (if it exists) when x = 0.
In order to answer that, we need to know the relationship between 'x' and 'y', which you haven't described in your question. Better answer: 'x' is never equal to 8 at the y-intercept. The y-intercept only depends on the relationship between 'x' and 'y'. After that, 'x' is always zero at the y-intercept.
Angles are formed between them
When comparing data between the x and y axes on the Cartesian plane it is important to learn about the slope-intercept straight line equation.
Their slopes are equal; y-intercept can be anything.
true
True
I believe only in the words, not in real usage.
The y-intercept is where the line crosses the y-axis, and the x-intercept is where the line cross the x-axis
The judge has a passive role in the adversary system and an active one in the inquisitorial. The counsel has an active role in the adversary and a passive role in the inquisitorial. In adversary, the burden of proof rests on the accuser whereas in the inquisitorial the burden of proof rests on noone. Adversary systems can have juries .
It is a functional card that sits in a BTS (A base transceiver station - a piece of equipment that facilitates wireless communication between user equipment and a network) and uses a Microwave band as link channel.
where as y-intercept on y-axis is distance between origin to the poin on y-axis How do you interpret the y-intercept as in statistics
The judge has a passive role in the adversary system and an active one in the inquisitorial. The counsel has an active role in the adversary and a passive role in the inquisitorial. In adversary, the burden of proof rests on the accuser whereas in the inquisitorial the burden of proof rests on noone. Adversary systems can have juries
y- intercept is positive 9 (+9). x- intercept is between negative 2 and 3 (-2 to -3)
The judge has a passive role in the adversary system and an active one in the inquisitorial. The counsel has an active role in the adversary and a passive role in the inquisitorial. In adversary, the burden of proof rests on the accuser whereas in the inquisitorial the burden of proof rests on noone. Adversary systems can have juries.
The judge has a passive role in the adversary system and an active one in the inquisitorial. The counsel has an active role in the adversary and a passive role in the inquisitorial. In adversary, the burden of proof rests on the accuser whereas in the inquisitorial the burden of proof rests on noone. Adversary systems can have juries.
The judge has a passive role in the adversary system and an active one in the inquisitorial. The counsel has an active role in the adversary and a passive role in the inquisitorial. In adversary, the burden of proof rests on the accuser whereas in the inquisitorial the burden of proof rests on noone. Adversary systems can have juries.