Not normally
Equilateral and Equiangular triangle
equilateral triangle is an example of regular polygon
If by regular, you're referring to a regular polygon which has all sides equal length, and all angles equal, then an equilateral triangle is a regular triangle. If you draw a scalene triangle or an isosceles triangle then it will not be equilateral.
Regular polygon is equilateral and equiangular. Irregular polygon is non-equilateral and non-equiangular.
No because a parallelogram is a quadrilateral that has 4 sides but any triangle has only 3 sides.
An equilateral triangle and a square.
Equilateral and Equiangular triangle
All regular polygons.
A polygon can be equilateral but not always equiangular. Some examples of this are rhomboids and other polygons like pentagons and hexagons.
An equilangular polygon is a polygon who's angles are equal.
An irregular polygon need not be equiangular.
An equilateral triangle. ►
A polygon cannot be equilateral but not equiangular because in the definiton of a regular polygon which is a polygon that is both equiangular and equilateral you see that you cannot have one without the other. As long as a polygon is equilateral it is also equilangular and vice versa. ARBETTES: You cannot have both in all polygons. In all triangles this is true. If a triangle is equilateral then it is equiangular. However, let's take a known quadrilateral: Rhombus. The definition of a Rhombus is that it has all equal sides. That's it. It's oppsite angles have to be congruent, but they do not all have to be 90 degrees.
it should make a square leaned over
A regular polygon must be equiangular as well as equilateral. A rhombus is an example of a polygon that is equilateral but not equiangular.
Yes I can't explain it through words easily, but I can help you visualize it. A triangle has to be equilangular and equilateral simultaneously. It can't have one property over the other, the reason for this is: In any way, shape, or form draw a square with side lengths of 2 units. Make this precise. Now, draw a rombus, with the exact same side lengths of the square. If you compare the two, all you basically did, was move the sides around/change the angle measures. With a triangle, you can't shift around the sides AT ALL (if you want, try making two equilateral triangles of different size. Can you change the angles without changing the side lengths?). Thus, triangles have to be equilateral AND equilangular. If you compare the two four sided shapes, you have now just proved that every polygon in existence with four or more sides can be equilateral, without being equilangular. However, the opossite does not work Try the above steps with ANY SHAPE that has more than four sides of the same length.
a regular polygon is always equilateral