Yes. Yes, it could. So could (0, -1) or (2, 3). Or, if you want, (x, 2x-1).
It's an equation in 'N' ... about the simplest one you could write.The solution of that equation is: N=0 .
An equation that equals 150 could be represented as ( x = 150 ). Alternatively, you could also write it as ( 2x = 300 ) or ( x + 50 = 200 ). Each of these equations has the solution ( x = 150 ).
there is an infinte amount of ordered pairs in this equation a few examples could be... (1,-3) (2,-13) (3,-23) (234652,-2346513) (-25,257)
Unfortunately, limitations of the browser used by Answers.com means that we cannot see most symbols. It is therefore impossible to give a proper answer to your question. Please resubmit your question spelling out the symbols as "plus", "minus", "times", "equals". There appear to be two equations, but no ordered pair.
To solve the equation (4x + 3y = 6), we can express it in terms of one variable. For example, if we solve for (y), we get (y = \frac{6 - 4x}{3}). An ordered pair solution could be found by choosing a value for (x). For (x = 0), the solution would be ((0, 2)).
It's an equation in 'N' ... about the simplest one you could write.The solution of that equation is: N=0 .
Yes, zero could be a possible solution to the equation.
Well either 12 or you could ask someone smart
An equation that equals 150 could be represented as ( x = 150 ). Alternatively, you could also write it as ( 2x = 300 ) or ( x + 50 = 200 ). Each of these equations has the solution ( x = 150 ).
there is an infinte amount of ordered pairs in this equation a few examples could be... (1,-3) (2,-13) (3,-23) (234652,-2346513) (-25,257)
Unfortunately, limitations of the browser used by Answers.com means that we cannot see most symbols. It is therefore impossible to give a proper answer to your question. Please resubmit your question spelling out the symbols as "plus", "minus", "times", "equals". There appear to be two equations, but no ordered pair.
To solve the equation (4x + 3y = 6), we can express it in terms of one variable. For example, if we solve for (y), we get (y = \frac{6 - 4x}{3}). An ordered pair solution could be found by choosing a value for (x). For (x = 0), the solution would be ((0, 2)).
You could call it "the answer" or "the solution".
A two-step equation with a variable that equals 23 could be (2x + 5 = 23). To solve for (x), first subtract 5 from both sides to get (2x = 18), and then divide by 2 to find (x = 9). Thus, the solution satisfies the original equation.
You cannot "solve" a single linear equation with two variables. Alternatively, you could argue that any one of the infinitely many points on the line represented by that equation is a solution.
-9
n-5 is an expression, it cannot be a solution. Furthermore, there are infinitely many possible equations for which n = 5 could be a solution - even with the added requirements of the question.