It is the mean of the number of children in the households with the 8th and 9th largest number of children.
it possible could mean size
If you mean as in a whole number then it is 7
No. Very often the mean will not be part of the data set. In most countries, the average number of children per family is some fractional number. For example, in 2006, the mean number of children in a UK family was 1.8. However, I have yet to come across 0.8 of a child!
It is not possible but if you mean 17/5 then it is 3 and 2/5 as a mixed number
It is the mean of the number of children in the households with the 8th and 9th largest number of children.
48
In reality, leather couches are best suited for households that aren't packed with children, but that doesn't mean they don't belong in such households. It takes a lot of roughhousing for a child to ruin a leather couch.
families, households
it possible could mean size
What do you mean by Human Resource Management? Also discuss, in brief, both the 'managerial' and the 'operative functions' of Human Resource Management.
If you mean as in a whole number then it is 7
Strictly speaking none as fathers are necessary for procreation but if you mean what percentage of American households exist without the father living there it is said to be as much as 40%.
No it for households as well as businesses
Pet Ownership Charts:DogsCatsBirdsHorsesPercent of households owning37.2%32.4%3.9%1.8%Number of households owning43,021,00037,460,0004,453,0002,087,000Average number owned per household1.72.22.53.5Total number in United States72,114,000---81,721,000---11,199,000---7,295,000Veterinary visits per household per year (mean)2.61.70.32.2Veterinary expenditure per household per year (mean)$356$190$25$360Veterinary expenditure per animal (mean)$200$81$9$92
It's the number of favorable outcomes & the number of possible outcomes.
They have no specific meaning. The order of letters and numbers are used to generate the largest number of possible combinations.