Chat with our AI personalities
The statement formed when you negate the hypothesis and conclusion of a conditional statement. For Example: If you had enough sleep, then you did well on the test. The inverse will be: If you didn't have enough sleep, then you didn't do well on the test.
You figure it out!
No, not always. It depends on if the original biconditional statement is true. For example take the following biconditional statement:x = 3 if and only if x2 = 9.From this biconditional statement we can extract two conditional statements (hence why it is called a bicondional statement):The Conditional Statement: If x = 3 then x2 = 9.This statement is true. However, the second statement we can extract is called the converse.The Converse: If x2=9 then x = 3.This statement is false, because x could also equal -3. Since this is false, it makes the entire original biconditional statement false.All it takes to prove that a statement is false is one counterexample.
Well, honey, let me break it down for you. How about this gem: "If it's raining, then the grass is wet." The conditional statement is false because the grass could be wet for other reasons. But flip it around and you've got yourself a true converse: "If the grass is wet, then it's raining." Just like that, a little logic twist for your day.
It is an example that demonstrates, by its very existence, that an assertion is false. Usually experience suggests that the assertion is true: there is a large amount of supporting "evidence" but the statement has not been proven. The counter-example, though demolishes the assertion For example: Assertion: all prime numbers are odd. Counter example: 2. It is a prime but it is not odd. Therefore the assertion is false. This was a favourite "trap" at GCSE exams in the UK. Assertion: if you divide a nuber it becomes smaller. Counter example 1: 2 divided by a half is, in fact, 4. Counter example 2: -10 divided by 2 is -5 (which is larger by being less negative).