Yes. Conditional distribution applies to fractions of rows/columns. Marginal distribution applies to the totals for each row/column
Everyday uses of percents include calculating discounts during sales, determining the tip amount for a meal at a restaurant, comparing prices at the grocery store, and understanding interest rates on loans or credit cards. Percentages are also commonly used to express probabilities, such as the chance of rain or the likelihood of an event occurring.
No, they are not.
Percents are used to calculate tax on EVERY store purchase,and to calculate discounts on every "special" or "bargain".If you can't calculate percents, you can't catch mistakes or avoid being cheated.
No but percentages are ratios.
12.8 = 1,280%
No one invented percents.
percents are numbers over 100
20 percents
Everyday uses of percents include calculating discounts during sales, determining the tip amount for a meal at a restaurant, comparing prices at the grocery store, and understanding interest rates on loans or credit cards. Percentages are also commonly used to express probabilities, such as the chance of rain or the likelihood of an event occurring.
They are all the same, fractions can be turned into percents and percents can be turned into fractions. hope that helps :)
Percents are 100 times larger (and that is by definition!).
Percents are basically decimals, and we use decimals as numbers with extra, tiny proportions. Percents are just ways to make those decimals into a whole, more friendlier number. But, percents can also be made with decimals as well.
lawyers use percents when figureing out prices and taxes of houses
When your data is in percents, a common type of graph to use is a pie chart. This type of graph is particularly useful for showing the distribution of a whole, where each category represents a percentage of the total. A pie chart is visually appealing and easily highlights the proportion of each category.
No, they are not.
Percents are easier since they don't need to be converted. It saves a step.
* * *