Carbon and chlorine are not numbers, so that kind of comparison is inappropriate.
Yes.
A planet with a greater mass does not necessarily have greater surface area than one with less mass. The planet could be made of denser material and have a smaller surface area. Mass doesn't always mean volume.
The mass of feathers is far greater than the lead. amount = mass So you will have a huge pile of feathers compared to a small chunk of lead to equal a pound
Element 34, Selenium, has an atomic mass of about 78.96.
Atomic oxygen does not have a greater atomic mass than chlorine, nor does molecular oxygen. The atomic mass of chlorine is approximately 35 g/mol, while molecular (O2) oxygen has a molecular mass of 32 g/mol.
Atom for atom, then NO!!!! Because the atomic mass of oxygen is '16' and atomic mass of neon is '20'. However, oxygen in the atmosphere exists as a diatomic molecule 'O2' Where as neon is a monatomic gas, and exists as single atoms. So one molecule of oxygen (O2) has a molecul;ar mass of 2 x 16 = 32 However, neon (Ne) remains monatomic so its mass remains at 20 . Thereby, oxygen (O2) at 32 is heavier than neon (Ne) at 20.
Yes, carbon has a greater molar mass than chlorine. The molar mass of carbon is about 12.011 g/mol, while the molar mass of chlorine is about 35.453 g/mol.
The mass of Cl-37 is greater than that of Cl-35. Because Cl-37 has two neutrons more than Cl-35.
Chlorine gas is heavier than oxygen. Chlorine gas has a molar mass of 70.9 g/mol, while oxygen has a molar mass of 32 g/mol. This difference in molar mass causes chlorine gas to be heavier and therefore it will tend to sink below oxygen in a mixture.
Electron affinity of chlorine is far grater than oxygen. For oxygen, its value is 141 KJ/mole whereas for Chlorine, it is 349 KJ/mole. Thus, adding an electron is more favourable in case of a gaseous chlorine atom
No, it is inverse.
The compound containing calcium and sulfur will have more mass than the compound containing calcium and oxygen. This is because sulfur has a greater atomic mass than oxygen.
No, chlorine is smaller than oxygen. In the periodic table, chlorine (Cl) has fewer electrons and a smaller atomic radius compared to oxygen (O).
When a nail rusts, iron in the nail reacts with oxygen in the air to form iron oxide (rust), which has a greater mass than iron alone. As a result, the overall mass of the nail increases when it rusts because the mass of the iron in the nail combines with the mass of the oxygen in the air to form iron oxide.
No, oxygen is more electronegative than chlorine. Oxygen has a higher electronegativity value on the periodic table (3.44) compared to chlorine (3.16). Electronegativity is a measure of an atom's ability to attract electrons in a chemical bond.
Oxygen is more electronegative than chlorine because oxygen has a higher effective nuclear charge, meaning the nucleus of an oxygen atom exerts a stronger pull on electrons compared to the nucleus of a chlorine atom. Additionally, oxygen has a smaller atomic size, which allows it to hold its electrons more closely and exert a greater attraction for electrons.