The word valid means true and the word faulty means false.
False.
Assuming that you mean not (p or q) if and only if P ~(PVQ)--> P so now construct a truth table, (just place it vertical since i cannot place it vertical through here.) P True True False False Q True False True False (PVQ) True True True False ~(PVQ) False False False True ~(PVQ)-->P True True True False if it's ~(P^Q) -->P then it's, P True True False False Q True False True False (P^Q) True False False False ~(P^Q) False True True True ~(P^Q)-->P True True False False
Neither. It is a hypothesis which may be true until proved or proved to be false.
Yes, it is true.
For Apex the answer is “True“.
True. - Valid arguments are deductive. - Arguments are valid if the premises lead to the conclusion without committing a fallacy. - If an argument is valid, that means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. - This means that a valid argument with a false premise can lead to a false conclusion. This is called a valid, unsound argument. - A valid, sound argument would be when, if the premises are true the conclusion must be true and the premises are true.
False. Not all laws made by a government are considered valid. Laws must adhere to the constitution and legal principles to be considered valid and enforceable. Additionally, laws that violate basic human rights or are unconstitutional can be challenged and overturned.
Yes, a valid argument can lead to a false conclusion if the premises are true but the reasoning process is flawed.
Facts cannot be valid. They can only be true or false. Arguments, on the other hand, can be valid. A valid argument in one which must have a true conclusion provided that the premises are true (no guarantee of that though).
true or false
If you mean edges, true. If you mean faces, false.
True
A sound argument cannot have a false conclusion. A sound argument refers to a deductive argument which is valid and has all true premises, therefore its conclusion cannot be false.
It means 'true'.
True.
Yes, an argument can be valid even if it contains false premises. Validity in an argument refers to the logical structure, where the conclusion follows logically from the premises, regardless of whether the premises are true or false.
No, valid arguments can have false conclusions. Validity refers to the logical connection between the premises and the conclusion, ensuring that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. However, the validity of an argument does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion, as the premises themselves could be false.