0
What else can I help you with?
How can a historian determine whether two events are casually related or correlated?
A historian can determine if two events are causally related or merely correlated by examining the context in which they occurred, looking for evidence of a direct influence between them. This may involve analyzing primary sources, identifying temporal sequences, and considering other contributing factors that could explain the relationship. Additionally, historians can use comparative analysis with similar events to strengthen their conclusions. Ultimately, establishing causation requires a careful assessment of the evidence to rule out alternative explanations.
How can a historian determine whether two events are causally related or correlated?
A historian can determine if two events are causally related by examining the context, sequence, and mechanisms linking them, looking for evidence that one event directly influences the other. They may analyze primary sources, secondary analyses, and historical patterns to identify causal connections, while also considering alternative explanations. Correlation can be assessed through statistical methods or comparative analysis, but historians must remain cautious not to conflate correlation with causation without robust evidence. Ultimately, a thorough investigation of the historical context and available evidence is crucial in making such determinations.
Is it true that if two variables are not linearly correlated then they are not related?
false they can be related with quadratic equation as well
Is women's intelligence proportional to the length of her skirt?
Skirt lengths and intelligence are randomly correlated having a correlation coefficient of zero to plus 0.15 ie knowing the measure of one does not predict the value of the other--they are independent variables. To say such and such are not correlated is to say you have not compared the variables. They may have identity with a value of plus one, or they may be inversely related having a value of negative one, or they may be randomly correlated with a value of zero--but to compare is to correlate.
How is saying that two variables are correlated different from saying saying that one caused the other?
Correlation and causality are not necessarily related. My age is pretty well correlated with the number of TV sets in the world. But neither of them is caused by the other. In this particular example, they both happen to be correlated to time, but there need not be such a factor. Conversely, let y = x2. Compile a set of pairs of x values, x = -m and x = +m and the corresponding y values, m2. Now, y is totally defined by x, but the correlation of y with x (not x2) for the above set of values will be zero. In this example x causes y but the relationship is not linear - the model is wrongly specified.
How does domestic violence and alcoholism relate?
They are correlated but not causally related.
How can a historian determine whether two events are casually related or correlated?
A historian can determine if two events are causally related or merely correlated by examining the context in which they occurred, looking for evidence of a direct influence between them. This may involve analyzing primary sources, identifying temporal sequences, and considering other contributing factors that could explain the relationship. Additionally, historians can use comparative analysis with similar events to strengthen their conclusions. Ultimately, establishing causation requires a careful assessment of the evidence to rule out alternative explanations.
How can a historian determine are casally related or correlated?
A historian can determine whether events are causally related or merely correlated by analyzing the context and sequence of events, looking for patterns that suggest a direct influence. They can utilize primary sources, such as documents or eyewitness accounts, to gather evidence of intention or consequence. Additionally, comparing multiple sources and considering external factors can help establish whether one event led to another or if they simply occurred simultaneously without a direct link. Critical analysis and triangulation of evidence are key to making these determinations.
What of the events listed after the passage are correlated but not causally related?
Good question! Correlation implies that two events occur together, but it does not necessarily mean that one causes the other. In this case, events listed after the passage might be correlated but not causally related if there is a pattern in their occurrence but no direct causal link between them.
How can a historian determine whether two events are causally related or correlated?
A historian can determine if two events are causally related by examining the context, sequence, and mechanisms linking them, looking for evidence that one event directly influences the other. They may analyze primary sources, secondary analyses, and historical patterns to identify causal connections, while also considering alternative explanations. Correlation can be assessed through statistical methods or comparative analysis, but historians must remain cautious not to conflate correlation with causation without robust evidence. Ultimately, a thorough investigation of the historical context and available evidence is crucial in making such determinations.
What is causally related?
If A is causally related to B, then it means that A has caused B.
What does a relationship between two correlated variables have?
Correlation between two variables implies a linear relationship between them. The existence of correlation implies no causal relationship: the two could be causally related to a third variable. For example, my age is correlated with the number of TV sets in the UK but obviously there is no causal link between them - they are both linked to time.
What preposition should follow the word correlated?
co-related to or co- related with
Is it true that if two variables are not linearly correlated then they are not related?
false they can be related with quadratic equation as well
What does the word correlated mean?
Anything mutually related to one another.
What is another word for correlated?
compare, connect, interact, equate
What does it mean if two sets of data are correlated?
they are related, but one might not be causing the other
