yes
No. You can still excel or do well in physics even if you are not good at computer science and chemistry. For example, physics is one of my favorite subjects, and I am pretty good at it. I am also good in math, but have never done anything computer science-related. I dislike chemistry, but love physics. I do not know much about the engineering aspect though, sorry. I'm sure you'd be fine though.
Given these two characteristics, there are four possibilities: Some people are good at math and have bad writing skills. Some people are good at math and have good writing skills. Some people are bad at math and have good writing skills. Some people are bad at math and have bad writing skills. Leaving aside what it means to be "good" or "bad" at these disciplines, it is likely that these groups of people have varying amounts of genetic predisposition for success at these aptitudes and their environments provided varying amounts of support or resistance to help them fulfill their levels of achievement. If you're suggesting a causal relationship, that to be "good" at one necessarily implies being "bad" at another, I don't think such generalizations are useful.
One can be gud in Math bcuz their minds can calculate stuff v fast.Writing papers z a totally diff thing.math z related 2 "NUMBERS" & writing essays r related 2 "LETTERS".
This one, of course!
yes
Science is more about vocabulary while math is about numbers
You can do Chemistry if you're interested in Chemistry and want to learn something about it. Math has nothing to do with it, one way or the other.
No. You can still excel or do well in physics even if you are not good at computer science and chemistry. For example, physics is one of my favorite subjects, and I am pretty good at it. I am also good in math, but have never done anything computer science-related. I dislike chemistry, but love physics. I do not know much about the engineering aspect though, sorry. I'm sure you'd be fine though.
Sure, why not; you can be good in more than one or two subjects.
YES. Usually, if you are good at Math, you are not as good at writing because there are many options and creative decisions. In Math there is just ONE correct answer, and that answer only.
Chemistry, Physics and Engineering are not made up of just mathematics, there are a lot of understanding of the physics and chemistry concepts to do well in those courses too. Most people who are bad at math will have difficulty solving physics and chemistry problems (although they may understand the concepts). though they might be quite good at certain kinds of chemistry (synthetic organic chemistry, for example, which is more about memorization and less about mathematical skills). However, being good at math does not automatically mean you'll also be good at chemistry."Good at math" is also a somewhat vague term. You can be a whiz at simple arithmetic and still be horrible at analytical-type mathematics ("word problems") which are more similar to the kind of understanding of mathematics that's required in the physical sciences. So if someone doesn't have an understanding of the concepts, then they would have difficulty setting up the math equations (which will model the actual physics, chemistry etc.)
Must be conceptual physics as physics has one language and that language is mathematics. I have never known a physicists that was not good at math.
Given these two characteristics, there are four possibilities: Some people are good at math and have bad writing skills. Some people are good at math and have good writing skills. Some people are bad at math and have good writing skills. Some people are bad at math and have bad writing skills. Leaving aside what it means to be "good" or "bad" at these disciplines, it is likely that these groups of people have varying amounts of genetic predisposition for success at these aptitudes and their environments provided varying amounts of support or resistance to help them fulfill their levels of achievement. If you're suggesting a causal relationship, that to be "good" at one necessarily implies being "bad" at another, I don't think such generalizations are useful.
The short answer is no. Physics, Chemistry and Engineering are nothing but applying math to the real world. So if you are good at math, you will likely do well. Writing becomes important with things like lab reports in school. In the real world, if you are going into one of these disciplines, writing may become important if you need to put together a technical document or wish to publish a paper on something that you are researching.
Chemistry can be both good and bad. Chemistry is good when it makes new and useful products, improves the environment or makes things safer for everyone. An example of Chemistry Gone Really Wrong is IG Farben, the industrial base behind the Third Reich. They made a lot of things specifically designed to kill lots of people--and the infamous Zyklon B used on concentration camp prisoners was just one of them.
You might, but you might not be a very good one and you may have to work harder at it.