Prove (verb). A prosecutor has to prove the defendant committed a crime. He presents the proof to the jury in order to prove his case.Another, job-specific verb form of proof is in my industry, journalism, where we will say "Would you proof this page?" In this case proof is a shortened version of the verb proofread. This probably is not in Webster's.
Corresponding angles must be equal; in this case, that would be angle f. To prove that the two triangles are equal, you would have to prove that at least another pair of angles is also equal, for example, angle b equal to angle d. Or prove some other facts, like the ratio between certain corresponding sides.
In the case of an inequality, if you mulitply by a negative number, you have to reverse the direction of the inequality. E.g.: -x < 10 becomes: x > -10 (Here, I multiplied by -1, and simultaneously reversed the direction of the inequality.)
true
No, it is not possible to draw a triangle with side lengths of 150, 20, and 20. In a triangle, the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than the length of the third side according to the Triangle Inequality Theorem. In this case, 20 + 20 is less than 150, so the given side lengths do not satisfy this theorem, making it impossible to form a triangle.
Prove (verb). A prosecutor has to prove the defendant committed a crime. He presents the proof to the jury in order to prove his case.Another, job-specific verb form of proof is in my industry, journalism, where we will say "Would you proof this page?" In this case proof is a shortened version of the verb proofread. This probably is not in Webster's.
"Beyond a reasonable doubt" in a criminal case, "A preponderance of the evidence" in a civil case. The advocate of a case always has the burden of proof - the prosecutor in a criminal case, the plaintiff in a civil case.
Burden of proof is who has to prove the case by meeting or exceeding the standard of proof. In a criminal case, it's the prosecution. In a civil case, it's the plaintiff. Standard of proof is the unquantifiable amount of proof that must be shown. In criminal cases, it's beyond a reasonable doubt. In civil cases, it's a preponderance of the evidence.
While the Law is an extremely complicated subject, and only an attorney is competent to say for sure, in general it is the responsibility of the accuser, or Plaintiff, to prove that what he/she says is true.
The burden in a criminal case is: "Proof beyond a REASONABLE doubt." Many people mistake this to mean proof beyond ALL doubt, but that is a mistaken understanding. There is no way to establish proof beyond ALL doubt, we can't even prove, beyond ALL doubt that God exists.
In a misdemeanor case, the burden of proof is typically "beyond a reasonable doubt." This means that the prosecution must prove that the defendant is guilty of the crime charged to a high degree of certainty.
The burden is on the tenant to prove that they paid.
The usual case is when you multiply or divide an inequality by a negative number.
yes
Excepted proof could be in the form of SMSs, taped phone calls or conversations or written requests for such liaisons.
Unlike a criminal case which requires "beyond a reasonable doubt," a civil case only requires a "preponderance of the evidence. " This is a much lower standard; the plaintiff must only prove their case to about 51 percent certainty.
A person can file a libel case by hiring an attorney. The attorney will decide if the person has enough proof to make a case. The attorney will usually need witness statements, documents, and other things to prove the case before filing.