0
Taking a lot of careful precautions.
- Design the sample (if any) with care so that there are no systematic sources of bias,
- look for and eliminate [as far as is possible] any external factors that might affect the experiment,
- Calibrate all measuring equipment carefully,
- Carry out the experiment with double-blind procedures so that no single person has complete knowledge of all the factors until all data have been collected. For example, a person giving a patient a placebo may unconsciously send out signals to the patient who may then respond differently.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Professor
Vivi
FranAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Whats the difference between random errors and systematic errors?
Random errors - Random errors can be evaluated through statistical analysis and can be reduced by averaging over a large number of observations. Systematic errors - Systematic errors are difficult to detect and cannot be analyzed statistically, because all of the data is off in the same direction (either to high or too low). Spotting and correcting for systematic error takes a lot of care.
What errors in your technique could cause the line not to go through zero?
Some of the reasons are: Systematic measurement errors. Random measurement errors. Poor use of equipment. Recording errors. Calculation errors. Poor plotting. Wrong model.
What is superlative form of systematic?
most systematic
To cut the maximum likely error in half the sample size should be?
... should be increased by a factor of 4. Note that this implies that the only errors are statistical (random) in nature; increasing the sample size won't improve systematic errors.
What does systematic mean in math?
basically systematic means a thing in the computer in the system called systematic because it has a smart way of working in the system but yeah thats the answer
