Actually, the order of operations is precisely why you want to
subtract the 16 first.
When you are EVALUATING an expression, you do the multiplication
first, then the addition. Here, however, you are not evaluating, but
SOLVING, which really means undoing the evaluation. If I knew what x
is, I would be first dividing it by -2, and then adding 16. The
result is 32. But we want to discover what that secret number is, so
we have to work backwards. First we undo the LAST step, the
addition, to see what number I added 16 to in order to end up with
32. That number is 32 - 16 = 16. Then, we undo the FIRST step, the
division, to see what number I divided by -2 to get 16; we multiply
by -2 and find that x is -32.
So solving requires following the order of operations backward!
I often illustrate this by describing how I put on my shoes and socks.
In the morning, I put on my socks first and then my shoes, following
the order of operations for dressing. At night, I don't take off my
socks first! I first undo the last thing I did, taking off the shoes,
and then the socks. Evaluating is dressing a variable, solving is
undressing it!
I think you are referring to checking a math equation. After you solve an equation you should go back and check your work to make sure you got the right answer. You can do this by plugging your answer back into the equation
The definition of work is (force) times (distance). If you mean you're given the equation and you need to solve it for 'work', then you only need to multiply both sides of the equation by 'time', and you'll have (power) x (time) = (work)
solve it
If you solve such an equation for "y", you get an equation in the slope-intercept form.
Work gives us energy in Joules, which can be subbed back into the first equation to solve for power.
Sure. You can always 'solve for' a variable, and if it happens to be the only variable in the equation, than that's how you solve the equation.
you don't answer an equation, you solve an equation
its mean solve the problem, to fine the solution like what makes it work.
I think you are referring to checking a math equation. After you solve an equation you should go back and check your work to make sure you got the right answer. You can do this by plugging your answer back into the equation
The definition of work is (force) times (distance). If you mean you're given the equation and you need to solve it for 'work', then you only need to multiply both sides of the equation by 'time', and you'll have (power) x (time) = (work)
solve it
If you solve such an equation for "y", you get an equation in the slope-intercept form.
Work gives us energy in Joules, which can be subbed back into the first equation to solve for power.
It is not an equation if it does not have an equals sign. You could simplify it but not solve it.
How do you use division to solve a multiplication equation?Answer this question…
you can only solve for one in an equation so it can equal something
There is no such thing as "solving integers". You can solve an equation, which means finding all the unknowns in that equation, but you can't solve an integer.