Change hull form (which is impractical) Lower Center of Gravity. (i.e. shifting heavy weights to a lower position)
No.
the same as a positive times a negative, a negative
The basic theory of imaginary numbers is that because (-) numbers squared are the same as (+) numbers squared there is not a correct continueos line on a graph.
There is no such thing as a negative set of integers. There can be a set of negative integers, but that is not the same thing. And even that does not make sense.There is no such thing as a negative set of integers. There can be a set of negative integers, but that is not the same thing. And even that does not make sense.There is no such thing as a negative set of integers. There can be a set of negative integers, but that is not the same thing. And even that does not make sense.There is no such thing as a negative set of integers. There can be a set of negative integers, but that is not the same thing. And even that does not make sense.
As far as positive numbers are concerned, the additive inverse of a positive number is a negative number with the same magnitude (i.e. the additive inverse of 5 is -5). It would be wrong to simply say that "negative" and "additive inverse" are correct, because the additive inverse of a negative number is a positive number.
The negative feedback tends to stabilize the circuit; positive feedback would make it more unstable. For example, the "beta" of a transistor OF THE SAME SERIES - this is basically the amplification factor - may vary between 100 and 1000. With negative feedback, the circuit is hardly affected by these changes in beta - at the cost of a reduced amplification.
No, this is not correct! -40 + (-70) = We have to add them and put the sign of the greatest number. Since the signs are the same the answer is -110.
Yes: cosecant = 1/sine If sine negative, 1/sine is negative → cosecant is negative.
It is the sign that is opposite, not the number But if the number magnitude is the same, it is correct to say that ,for example, negative 6 is the opposite of positive six. But negative 4 is not the opposite of negative 8, for example
If you mean protons and electrons then protons are positive and electrons are negative, so the protons and electrons cancel each other out leaving the atom stable. If the numbers were uneven, the atom would be unstable and decay, but that doesn't mean that all unstable atoms have an uneven number of protons and electrons.
No.
the same as a positive times a negative, a negative
The correct properties are found in answer A. The slope of a line is always positive, no matter which way the line is angled or heading.
The basic theory of imaginary numbers is that because (-) numbers squared are the same as (+) numbers squared there is not a correct continueos line on a graph.
Work at the same job until they die.
no
Yes. Same for positive times a positive (Obviously). If the signs are the same, it is positive. So, a positive times a negative is negative.