Detectives have to prove their theories. Mathematics is one method of proving their case. Numbers don't lie.
False. In an indirect proof, you assume the opposite of what you intend to prove is true. This method involves showing that this assumption leads to a contradiction, thereby confirming that the original statement must be true.
The term that best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you intend to prove is "proof by contradiction." In this method, you start by assuming that the statement you want to prove is false. Then, by logically deriving a contradiction from that assumption, you conclude that the original statement must be true. This technique is commonly used in various fields of mathematics and logic.
I think so. Copy and paste method could be used to prove this. But this is only my opinion.
The answer depends on the method used for constructing the second line. But since you have not bothered to provide that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
how did they prove their result
yes the scientific method does work . results of tests and expirements prove the accuracy of this method of uncovering science.
axiomatic method
a butt
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FAysMWwk4k
the scientific method but i dont remember the specific headings
Judicial Proof
TRue
No a correlation method does not prove any kind of cause the only method that will prove Cause and Effect would be a Experiment Lab(hypothesis, Control group, Independent Variable ext...)
you got to sent something to them an prove them you will and know how to rap
to test to prove its right or a educated guess
no