Tags Math and Arithmetic

Animals & Plants Arts & Entertainment Auto Beauty & Health Books and Literature Business Electronics Engineering & Technology Food & Drink History Hobbies Jobs & Education Law & Government Math People & Society Science Social Studies Sports Travel & Places

0

Subjects>Math>Math & Arithmetic

How do historians evaluate evidence to determineif it is reliable?

Anonymous

∙ 11y ago

Updated: 9/23/2023

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

Lao

The path is yours to walk; I am only here to hold up a mirror.

Chat with Lao

Rene

Change my mind. I dare you.

Chat with Rene

Ross

Every question is just a happy little opportunity.

Chat with Ross

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts

Q: How do historians evaluate evidence to determineif it is reliable?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

imp

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

Does physical evidence have greater value than eyewitness in court?

Evidence and witnesses are only as good as the lawyers questioning them or presenting evidence. Both can be reliable or found unreliable.

Why do you need to collect more data to obtain reliable data?

The more data you have, the more accurate your information. If you have a large amount of evidence of one result, it makes it look correct.

What is the adverb of reliable?

Reliably is the adverbial form of reliable.

What are three features of reliable data?

what are three features of reliable data?

How many syllables are in the word reliable?

The word reliable has four syllables. Re-li-a-ble.

Trending Questions

What is the HCF of 33 and 6? What are two different parallel lines? Where do you find Hindu Arabic numeral? How Envisioning the most drastically negative thing that could happen and how you would handle it is known as formulating a? Look at the equation a times x equals 0 What value of x makes this equation true when a is not equal to 0? Write 236749 according to international system? What does it mean when the slope of a line equals zero? What are the first 3 multiples of 110? What is 100 minus -80? What is the decimal 0.67 written as a fraction? How do you divide 0.01? What are some facts about Isaac? How many gallons are in 160 fluid ounces? How many times does the letter 'c' appear from 1-100? What is an inverse property of subtraction? Is nine an adjetvie? Predict someone's academic success? What is 538152 rounded to the nearesthundred thousand? Can 4 go in to 45? What is 65 of 100?

Related Questions

Which method separates modern historians from ancient Greek historians?

Basing historical accounts on reliable evidence

What do historians intend to do when they make a claim?

Historians intend to support their claims with evidence from historical sources, such as documents, artifacts, and other records. They aim to provide a well-reasoned interpretation of the past based on the available evidence. Their goal is to construct an accurate and reliable account of historical events and developments.

Why is it harder for a historian to use sources than for a detective?

Historians often deal with incomplete, biased, or conflicting sources, making it challenging to piece together an accurate narrative. Unlike detectives who may have access to physical evidence, historians must interpret and analyze historical documents to construct their understanding of the past. Additionally, historical sources may be limited by the perspectives or agendas of their creators, requiring historians to critically evaluate their reliability.

Why do historians not find livy a reliable source of information?

They do find reliable sources. Without that their work is invalid and wrong.

To determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable historians generally?

Answer this question… check to see if the information in the source is confirmed by other sources.

How reliable is DNA fingerprinting?

It is not infallable, but it is considered reliable enough to be use as evidence.

Based on no reliable evidence?

ill founded

What do reliable sources include in order to allow readers to evaluate sources for themselves?

Citations

What problems do gaps in evidence cause historians?

Historians rely on primary sources to reach conclusions. Gaps in history, where there is no written documentation of events may leave historians in a quandary. They must then rely on archaeological evidence, and secondary sources, if available. Historians must ask the following: Is the information reliable? What was the reputation of the writer at the time? Does the archaeological record, primary, or secondary sources disagree with previously published historiography concerning the person or event? How accurate is prior published historiography concerning the subject matter? New evidence can displace old theories regarding history, so historians must be ready to adjust their thesis to reflect this information. Historians must also recognize that myth may shroud the truth about history. "Lost Cause" mythology concerning the American Civil War is a good example of lies perpetuated as history that has been disproved by primary sources.

What do gaps in evidence cause historians?

Historians rely on primary sources to reach conclusions. Gaps in history, where there is no written documentation of events may leave historians in a quandary. They must then rely on archaeological evidence, and secondary sources, if available. Historians must ask the following: Is the information reliable? What was the reputation of the writer at the time? Does the archaeological record, primary, or secondary sources disagree with previously published historiography concerning the person or event? How accurate is prior published historiography concerning the subject matter? New evidence can displace old theories regarding history, so historians must be ready to adjust their thesis to reflect this information. Historians must also recognize that myth may shroud the truth about history. "Lost Cause" mythology concerning the American Civil War is a good example of lies perpetuated as history that has been disproved by primary sources.

Historians cross-check their research?

Historians cross-check their research by consulting multiple sources to verify information and ensure accuracy. This process involves comparing accounts, analyzing data, and looking for corroborating evidence from different perspectives to construct a more comprehensive understanding of historical events. By verifying information in this way, historians aim to establish a more reliable and nuanced interpretation of the past.

Why Historians are concerned with accuracy of their writings and readings but are also aware of?

Historians are concerned with accuracy to ensure that the information they provide is reliable and can be trusted by others. They are also aware of the limitations of historical sources, such as bias or incomplete information, and strive to critically evaluate and interpret these sources to present a well-rounded and nuanced understanding of the past.

Resources

Top Categories

Product

Company

Copyright ©2025 Infospace Holdings LLC, A System1 Company. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Answers.