Its height (h) is side (s) times sin 60 orsqrt(3)/2 times side = .866s
h = .866s
s = h/.866 = 2/sqrt(3) s = 1.154 h
perimeter = s + s + s = 3s = 3 x 2/sqrt(3) = 3.46s
It would depend on the shape that you are asking about. Also, only special shapes could express area as a function of the perimeter.Example: a square: area = s2, where s is the length of a side. Perimeter of a square is 4*s.So if P (for perimeter) = 4 * s, then s = P/4,and A (for area) = s2 = (P/4)2 = P2/16But for a rectangle that is not a square, there is no relationship between area and perimeter.
- tan 60
30
The zero of a function is a point where the function evaluates to zero. If you express "y" as a function of "x", i.e. y = f(x), then for a zero of the function, the y-coordinate is 0. In other words, the corresponding point is on the x-axis.
D = 60T where T is expressed in hours.
Let's express the side length of an equilateral triangle, a, in term of the height h.a = (1/3)(h)(sq.root of 3)The perimeter equals to 3a. So we have:3a = 3[(1/3)(h)(sq.root of 3)] = (h)(sq.root of 3)] = 18(sq.root of 3)
Listen up, honey. The area of an equilateral triangle is given by the formula A = (sqrt(3)/4) * x^2, and the perimeter is simply P = 3x. So, if you want to express the area and perimeter of that triangle as a function of the side length x, there you have it. You're welcome.
36 square units. You can't express a perimeter in square units; a perimeter is a length expressed in ordinary units. If the perimeter of this square is 24 units then the answer above is correct.
It would depend on the shape that you are asking about. Also, only special shapes could express area as a function of the perimeter.Example: a square: area = s2, where s is the length of a side. Perimeter of a square is 4*s.So if P (for perimeter) = 4 * s, then s = P/4,and A (for area) = s2 = (P/4)2 = P2/16But for a rectangle that is not a square, there is no relationship between area and perimeter.
Suppose the length and width of the rectangle are L and W metres respectively.Then the perimeter, P = 20 m implies that2(L + W ) = 20 => L + W = 10 or W = 10 - L.Then Area = L * W = L * (10 - L) sq metres.
To express action
To express action
It is 1/4 or 0.25
You use linear units to express it, such as meters or millimeters, if that's what you mean.
- tan 60
5*4+4=24cm
No. That can be proven in this way, accepting the truth of the Pythagorean Theorem, which says that the square of the length of the hypotenuse, c, of a right triangle with orthogonal sides a and b, will always be equal to the sum of the squares of the lengths of sides a and b. If c is the length of side c, and so on, the Pythagorean Theorem stated above becomes this mathematical statement: c2 = a2 + b2 One way to test a hypothesis is to express the assumed case, apply logic steps to it, and examine the truth of the result. So if we assume for argument that our right triangle is equilateral, and assign length xequally to all three sides--a, b, & c--we could write the equation thus: x2 = x2 + x2 which becomes x2 = 2(x2) Factoring out x2, we get 1 = 2 We've arrived at a mathematical contradiction, disproving our assumption. There cannot be right-angled equilateral triangles.