You cannot.
You have two choices - neither of which are particularly enlightening:
If there are other values that could have appeared but did not, then each one of the observed values is a mode (they appeared more often than the ones that had zero appearances); or
If there were no such vales, you have no modes.
If all the members of a set are different values, there is no mode.
To find the mode:Add all the numbers together.Divide that number by the number of numbers that you added.And voila! You have the mode. Enjoy.
well they are all the mode then. however if thaat is the case then it makes the mode an irrelevant piece of data.
there is no mode at all then
For the situation you state, there is no mode.
If all the members of a set are different values, there is no mode.
There is no mode if all of the numbers are different.
To find the mode:Add all the numbers together.Divide that number by the number of numbers that you added.And voila! You have the mode. Enjoy.
well they are all the mode then. however if thaat is the case then it makes the mode an irrelevant piece of data.
there is no mode at all then
All three numbers are the mode.
add all the numbers together and divid by how many numbers you added
Then either there is no mode or you write down that all the numbers are the mode.
All the repeated ones are the mode.
For the situation you state, there is no mode.
There is no mode because all the numbers are different
Mode is a type of average, modal average. It's where you look at all of the numbers in your sample size and find the most frequently occurring number.