A perfect cube is.
It is not a perfect cube.
It is not a perfect cube.
It is called a perfect cube.
To find a number that is a perfect cube, take an integer, mulitply it by itself and again. The answer is a perfect cube. Thus n * n * n To find a perfect cube as a 3 dimensional object is not possible. It is a concept that can exist only in your imagination. Any physical representation is bound to have microscopic (or smaller) flaws - certainly at the sub-atomic level.
There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.
If by cube you mean perfect cube (a cube of an integer), then no, and the nearest perfect cube is 81.
It is a perfect cube.
A perfect cube is.
It is not a perfect cube.
It is not a perfect cube.
It is not a perfect cube.
It is called a perfect cube.
To find a number that is a perfect cube, take an integer, mulitply it by itself and again. The answer is a perfect cube. Thus n * n * n To find a perfect cube as a 3 dimensional object is not possible. It is a concept that can exist only in your imagination. Any physical representation is bound to have microscopic (or smaller) flaws - certainly at the sub-atomic level.
It is both because 1,000,000 is a perfect cube and a perfect square number
a perfect cube
Yes, it is a perfect cube.