To find a number that is a perfect cube, take an integer, mulitply it by itself and again. The answer is a perfect cube.
Thus n * n * n
To find a perfect cube as a 3 dimensional object is not possible. It is a concept that can exist only in your imagination. Any physical representation is bound to have microscopic (or smaller) flaws - certainly at the sub-atomic level.
no it is not 4 is a perfect cube
No, 148 is not a perfect cube.
Length X Width X Height Or if it's a perfect cube, just find one side and cube it.
juss countt all the sides'xx !
No, 2 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube.
no it is not 4 is a perfect cube
If by cube you mean perfect cube (a cube of an integer), then no, and the nearest perfect cube is 81.
No, 148 is not a perfect cube.
Length X Width X Height Or if it's a perfect cube, just find one side and cube it.
juss countt all the sides'xx !
No, 2 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube.
Because they are square/cube of an integer.
It is both because 1,000,000 is a perfect cube and a perfect square number
A cube root of a perfect cube has only one dimension. A perfect cube is a number that can be obtained by multiplying an integer by itself three times. Taking the cube root of a perfect cube will give you the original integer value, effectively reducing the dimensionality back to one.
To find the largest perfect cube factor of 189, we first need to factor it into its prime components. The prime factorization of 189 is (3^3 \times 7^1). The largest perfect cube that can be formed from these factors is (3^3), which equals 27. Therefore, the largest perfect cube factor of 189 is 27.
There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.
Not a perfect cube.