With great difficulty because the square root of 2 is an irrational number
* * * * *
One way to find the square root of a number is an iterative method. This entails making a guess at the answer and then improving on it. Repeating the procedure should lead to a better estimate at each stage. One such is the Newton-Raphson method.
If you want to find the square root of 2, define f(x) = x2 - 2.
Then finding the square root of 2 is equivalent to solving f(x) = 0.
Let f'(x) = 2x. This is the derivative of f(x) but you do not need to know that to use the N-R method.
Start with x0 as the first guess.
Then let xn+1 = xn - f(xn)/f'(xn) for n = 0, 1, 2, …
Provided you made a reasonable choice for the starting point, the iteration will very quickly converge to the true answer. Even if your first guess is not so good:
Suppose you start with x0 = 2 (a pretty poor choice since 22 is 4, which is nowhere near 2).
Even so, x3 = 1.414215686, which is less than 1-in-a billion from the true value. Finally, remember that the negative value is also a square root.
Chat with our AI personalities
It is: 2 times the square root of 2
A circle is not a number, it is a 2-dimensional shape. A number can have a square root, not a shape. So, a circle cannot have a square root!.
i hace no idea
Yes, the whole idea of taking the "square root" of a number is, for example for the square root of 2, to find the number that, when squared, gives you 2. if you try to do both, they cancel each other out.
2 square root 2